#EdenTasks - Proofreading Program

Contributor: Love Buzz Love Buzz
Quote:
Originally posted by ~LaUr3n~
It is at 3 per day, per type of which there are two. Follow up and regular. It used to be a huge cap and now it is a fraction of what it was before.

It's like a mini job on eden and so there is appropriate compensation.
no, i do agree that its a job, one that deserves compensation, but obviously to start with it was uncapped, but thats just one of the things that comes hand in hand with implementing new programs across the site.

But since Lauren has brought up the job/compensation thing I just wanted to bring up something that really only clicked in my head in the last half hour.

I just submitted a nightmare review to my mentor cherryredhead, as my mentor she is also my editor. (Im a mentor myself but love her fresh eyes that catch my errors as well as her support) As Im already an advanced reviewer she won't receive any compensation when I graduate. Well as far as I know she doesn't..

To the best of my knowledge she isn't yet approved to be an editor, but is performing the same task that an approved editor does, actually she goes above and beyond that, as do many mentors who work with adv reviewers. I think that mentors who are performing editor duties do deserve to be paid for their mini jobs

If this is already the case I'll shut my trap, but it only just ocurred to me so I wanted to bring it up
01/18/2011
Contributor: Kindred Kindred
Quote:
Originally posted by Love Buzz
no, i do agree that its a job, one that deserves compensation, but obviously to start with it was uncapped, but thats just one of the things that comes hand in hand with implementing new programs across the site.

But since Lauren has brought ... more
I think it would be great if mentors got compensated for working with reviewers that are already Advanced, whether by points or GC. However, under the current system, your reviews would auto-publish, so no editor would work on your reviews. If the current "rules" were applied, only Advanced reviewers ranked below 5.5 would earn points for being edited. I think what Cherry is doing is great, and I think pretty much all mentors are happy to do the same, regardless of the reward. I would also guess that the programming would be a nightmare.
01/18/2011
Contributor: ~LaUr3n~ ~LaUr3n~
Quote:
Originally posted by ZenaidaMacroura
Thanks. So are you, of course. And I used to do the same thing with voting before I actually became an editor. Like, I'd see an error and vote good instead of excellent. Now that I'm actually seeing how hard it can be to catch everything and ... more
Thanks! Yea, that's basically what I'm doing. I was also voting that way because to me I thought it would look like I didn't read the review if I voted excellent when there were mistakes that I found. Plus, then if there were, the editor would not know they missed something. I would want to know if it was something major. But that is the key word 'major'. I've changed what is considered major. It isn't the same to everyone. For me, I add a simple: It is... not very loud. I do that just to make it more readable in a flowing way. I usually tell the person if I had to do that more than a few times.
01/18/2011
Contributor: ~LaUr3n~ ~LaUr3n~
Quote:
Originally posted by Love Buzz
no, i do agree that its a job, one that deserves compensation, but obviously to start with it was uncapped, but thats just one of the things that comes hand in hand with implementing new programs across the site.

But since Lauren has brought ... more
I have thought of this too. I know of a few people who are not happy with not getting any compensation for people who are already advanced or change after signing up. For many mentors, it's the same amount of work. The title of "advanced" doesn't change much at the beginning rate levels (for many, not all though). It's a nice idea, one I've thought of before.

To play devil's advocate, those who are above 5.5 and in the mentor program would be editing their reviews on their own and no one would be getting any compensation for it anyways. So, I think it would be fair to have it, but I could also see the argument for the other side. You can always reward your mentor for taking you on when you are advanced. I have had a few students gracious do this.
01/18/2011
Contributor: ~LaUr3n~ ~LaUr3n~
Quote:
Originally posted by Kindred
I think it would be great if mentors got compensated for working with reviewers that are already Advanced, whether by points or GC. However, under the current system, your reviews would auto-publish, so no editor would work on your reviews. If the ... more
This. Yea, they would auto-publish anyways. I take on already advanced students and I am happy to. It's the ability to apply for advanced while in a class that used to bug me.
01/18/2011
Contributor: Love Buzz Love Buzz
ok, looks like I was misunderstanding a couple of points regarding the editing.

So for people over 5.5 do their reviews auto publish bypassing the whole 'editing' phase?

I thought that pretty much all reviews were now being signed off by an editor before being published.
01/18/2011
Contributor: Tuesday Tuesday
Quote:
Originally posted by ~LaUr3n~
I think it is just that they have enough in the program now and are seeing how it works with this amount and how it is working etc. before moving forward.
Some people were accepted into the program, even if no one has been accepted recently. The fact that they're holding steady now doesn't clarify what the selection criteria were.
01/19/2011
Contributor: ZenaidaMacroura ZenaidaMacroura
So, I'm wondering if there's a glitch or if they've changed the limit or something? After editing one review, it says "No editor may review more than three reviews a day" (or something to that effect), but I've only done one. This happened yesterday, too, when I'd only done two. I thought it was just a fluke, but it's still doing it. I'm not sure who to message with this problem, either.
01/22/2011
Contributor: Kindred Kindred
Quote:
Originally posted by ZenaidaMacroura
So, I'm wondering if there's a glitch or if they've changed the limit or something? After editing one review, it says "No editor may review more than three reviews a day" (or something to that effect), but I've only done ... more
As far as I recall, I have not had a problem with what you describe. Is it possible it's the time that you are reviewing them in that the early ones actually counted for the previous day, and the more recent ones count for the current day? I'm not sure when the "day" actually occurs relative to EF. You can check your "my tasks" and review your history to see how many you've done. Otherwise, I think you can contact either Gary or JR with issues, but my guess is someone like Neuron Geek will have to look into it.
01/23/2011
Contributor: VieuxCarre VieuxCarre
Is it normal for the approval process to take almost 3 weeks?
01/25/2011
Contributor: BBW Talks Toys BBW Talks Toys
Quote:
Originally posted by VieuxCarre
Is it normal for the approval process to take almost 3 weeks?
I think it took about 4-5 for me to hear.
01/25/2011
Contributor: ZenaidaMacroura ZenaidaMacroura
Quote:
Originally posted by VieuxCarre
Is it normal for the approval process to take almost 3 weeks?
Yeah, it took me at least a month.
01/27/2011
Contributor: Selective Sensualist Selective Sensualist
I just edited a review here and noticed that, upon publishing, the spacing is weird.

So, I reopened under MyTasks to see if I could see the messed-up spacing from the editor's side of things, but everything looks normal.

How can I fix this if the spacing looks normal from the editor's viewpoint? (How did this happen?)
02/04/2011
Contributor: Selective Sensualist Selective Sensualist
Okay, that was weird. I managed to fix it, but I'm still not sure why the spacing was messed up. Since the review's spacing is now normal, I'll just try to describe what occurred.

For some reason, it looked like "enter" had been pressed mid-sentence all throughout the review. In other words, about mid-way across the screen, the sentences would suddenly truncate as though a new paragraph had been started (though it was mid-sentence).

When I checked from the editor's side, the spacing did not appear this way -- and there were no extra spaces to be found anywhere.

I fixed it by comparing back and forth between two screens: I had the review, as published, on one screen and my editor's version on another screen. I found each place mid-sentence where the spacing was messed up and hit the backspace key to close the gap (which joined two separate words together) and then hit the space bar to re-add the space I'd just removed. For some odd reason, this worked to fix the spacing (though for a couple of these sentences, I had to do this procedure twice for it to work).

Hope this helps anyone else who has this happen! That was odd.
02/04/2011
Contributor: Kindred Kindred
Quote:
Originally posted by Selective Sensualist
Okay, that was weird. I managed to fix it, but I'm still not sure why the spacing was messed up. Since the review's spacing is now normal, I'll just try to describe what occurred.

For some reason, it looked like "enter" ... more
That sounds like what happens when I've copy/pasted text from an Adobe PDF to Word document. I'm guessing the original author did some form of copy/paste and the review template did not recognize the formatting. You may want to message them and ask, and if so, ask them to correct it before submitting in the future.
02/04/2011
Contributor: ZenaidaMacroura ZenaidaMacroura
Quote:
Originally posted by Selective Sensualist
Okay, that was weird. I managed to fix it, but I'm still not sure why the spacing was messed up. Since the review's spacing is now normal, I'll just try to describe what occurred.

For some reason, it looked like "enter" ... more
I had that happen once. In the editing part, it looked normal, but when published, it was all weird like that. I had the same idea you did, and yeah, it fixed it. It was weird, though.
02/14/2011
Contributor: Splendwhore Splendwhore
So I submitted a request to join the EdenTasks program last week, & I haven't heard an answer back one way or the other.
I heard that it was possible the program was no longer taking on editors. Is this true?
03/11/2011
Contributor: Dusk Dusk
Quote:
Originally posted by Splendwhore
So I submitted a request to join the EdenTasks program last week, & I haven't heard an answer back one way or the other.
I heard that it was possible the program was no longer taking on editors. Is this true?
I'm not sure, I got denied during the initial influx so I just recently applied again because I really, really want to be an editor.
03/11/2011
Contributor: ~LaUr3n~ ~LaUr3n~
Anyone else see the eden point values change? The first few reviews that are stuck there are different values and the rest are cut in half.
03/18/2011
Contributor: ZenaidaMacroura ZenaidaMacroura
Quote:
Originally posted by ~LaUr3n~
Anyone else see the eden point values change? The first few reviews that are stuck there are different values and the rest are cut in half.
I saw that a few days ago. I've noticed a few weird things like that. I noticed a couple of reviews would also just link back to the main page on EF rather than to the review, too.
03/18/2011
Contributor: Kindred Kindred
Quote:
Originally posted by ~LaUr3n~
Anyone else see the eden point values change? The first few reviews that are stuck there are different values and the rest are cut in half.
I think the weird points issue is related to the 'Atlanta Move" double points promotional. At first, new reviews submitted did not have double point values. And now that the promotional is over, it seems the point values have been halved. I sent JR an email yesterday informing him of the apparent points glitch.
03/19/2011
Contributor: ~LaUr3n~ ~LaUr3n~
Quote:
Originally posted by Kindred
I think the weird points issue is related to the 'Atlanta Move" double points promotional. At first, new reviews submitted did not have double point values. And now that the promotional is over, it seems the point values have been halved. I ... more
I didn't get any reviews edited that gave double points. I figured that would have been way too much. So, I assumed that's why they went halved when it was over.
03/19/2011
Contributor: Kindred Kindred
Quote:
Originally posted by ~LaUr3n~
I didn't get any reviews edited that gave double points. I figured that would have been way too much. So, I assumed that's why they went halved when it was over.
Initially, reviews that were already on the list got doubled but any new reviews that got added did not. I think even editing points were supposed to be doubled, at least based on my conversation with JR.
03/19/2011
Contributor: Rockin' Rockin'
Just wanted to pop in and say that while the unassigned (usually 250pt) reviews are listed as "125 points" in the Task Market, and they show a +125 popup when you publish a review, if you check the EdenPoints record for the day, they are still showing up as 250 items.
03/20/2011
Contributor: ZenaidaMacroura ZenaidaMacroura
Quote:
Originally posted by Rockin'
Just wanted to pop in and say that while the unassigned (usually 250pt) reviews are listed as "125 points" in the Task Market, and they show a +125 popup when you publish a review, if you check the EdenPoints record for the day, they are ... more
Ooh, I see. Thanks for clearing that up! I figured all those points had gotten to be too much, so they halved them or something. I assume it's a glitch, then.
03/20/2011
Contributor: Cream in the Cupcake Cream in the Cupcake
Im finally at a 5.0 ranking but that isnt checked off my list. Also, how do I request it? Will that happen when my ranking goes through?
03/22/2011
Contributor: DeliciousSurprise DeliciousSurprise
Quote:
Originally posted by Cream in the Cupcake
Im finally at a 5.0 ranking but that isnt checked off my list. Also, how do I request it? Will that happen when my ranking goes through?
Have you met all of the other requirements? (Personal info and email filled out? Avatar chosen?) If so, you may need to hit 5.1 for it to recognize you're higher than a 5.0

When that has been checked off, you will be able to submit a request to join the program.

I do not know if they are currently accepting new editors, but if they are you will be notified of your accepted/declined status shortly thereafter.
03/22/2011
Contributor: Splendwhore Splendwhore
Quote:
Originally posted by ZenaidaMacroura
So, I'm wondering if there's a glitch or if they've changed the limit or something? After editing one review, it says "No editor may review more than three reviews a day" (or something to that effect), but I've only done ... more
I'm having a similar problem. Whenever I try to take on a new task, I receive this message: "Each editor may not proofread more than 3 reviews a day." I don't believe it's an issue of reviews from previous days carrying over, as these are the first few reviews I've done for the program. I was under the impression that 10 reviews per day was the limit as well.. ?
03/23/2011
Contributor: DeliciousSurprise DeliciousSurprise
Quote:
Originally posted by Splendwhore
I'm having a similar problem. Whenever I try to take on a new task, I receive this message: "Each editor may not proofread more than 3 reviews a day." I don't believe it's an issue of reviews from previous days carrying over, as ... more
Are you accepting reviews and then releasing them/transferring them to admin, or are you just unable to accept any?
03/23/2011
Contributor: Selective Sensualist Selective Sensualist
Quote:
Originally posted by Splendwhore
I'm having a similar problem. Whenever I try to take on a new task, I receive this message: "Each editor may not proofread more than 3 reviews a day." I don't believe it's an issue of reviews from previous days carrying over, as ... more
The limit has been three reviews a day per editor as long as I've been editing. You can pick up three followup reviews per day as well. When the program first started, I believe the limit was set to ten reviews per day.

Is the system not letting you do three reviews and three followups per day?
03/23/2011