Quote:
Originally posted by
P'Gell
I see the rating system as this
extremely useful: Something above and beyond just "good"
useful: a good job
somewhat useful: an adequate job, but
...
more
I see the rating system as this
extremely useful: Something above and beyond just "good"
useful: a good job
somewhat useful: an adequate job, but might need some improvement and additional information
worth reading, but not useful: needs to go back, read other people's reviews and learn more about the reviewing process
not useful at all: not a good review in any way
As a rule, honest ratings don't bother me at all. Sometimes one of my reviews simply may not hit a regular reader as "extremely useful" if it's a regular, and I know they are honest and do good reviews themselves, it doesn't bother me at all, because they KNOW what goes into a review.
It bugs me when people who write NO reviews themselves and never participate in the forums go around and rate other's reviews, and most of these people usually give pretty low ratings. There are a few who seem to do nothing but hang around and rate some people very low (usually the reviewers who have high ratings) and seem to rate seemingly inadequate reviews as "extremely useful." Are these people with two or more identities? Those who are not doing a good job and trying to bring down good reviews to raise their own rating? We've seen this before.
Some of these people also seem to vote others into the "Advanced Reviewer" category. Really THINK about the quality of the reviews before you vote someone to be Advanced The reviewers are the face of Eden, and poor reviews don't help the site nor anyone else.
I know we need to allow shoppers to rate reviews, but they may not realize what goes into to REALLY good review. Two systems? One for the casual shopper, and those who have not submitted reviews and do not participate in the forums, and one for regulars who KNOW how much work goes into a good review? That might be too much for the site to have to deal with. I don't know.
What if only members or advanced reviewers could vote? It might discourage people who are here to shop. But, those not familiar with the site or the intricacies of sex toys and their materials and functions seem to be more harsh in their rating.
less
I agree and I know it's hard to watch all those dopes down voting everyone for no reason.
The way I vote is that if I really liked a review and it gave me a good idea of the product, extremely useful.
If it had good info but just didn't answer what I was looking for I will go useful.
I try to go easy on those newer to reviews, but if someone appears to have just slapped something together without even trying I will vote low.
It is rare that I ever rate less than useful.
I also agree with that whole separate system deal, but I am 90% positive that would just be too much work. Luckily us regs can take out all the trolls and point farmers when it comes to rating our fellow peers.