Quote:
Originally posted by
aBeastlyLittleThing
i fall somewhere between A Libertarian, and an Anarchist. not that bs looting, no laws no rules do whatever tf we want all the time crap, that people think of when they hear anarchy, but the real anarchy. no the people are the government, and no one
...
more
i fall somewhere between A Libertarian, and an Anarchist. not that bs looting, no laws no rules do whatever tf we want all the time crap, that people think of when they hear anarchy, but the real anarchy. no the people are the government, and no one person has power over another person. "Anarchy means no Leaders, not No Order." as Alan Moore put it[in V for Vendetta, the book]
less
Interesting fantasy - seems like an off shoot of utopian thinking. In the US we probably have more freedom from our rulers than anyplace in the world. Peoples abuses of their freedoms are precisely why limits to freedoms are necessary.
Your definition of anarchy assumes that all people have honorable intentions - nothing could be farther from the truth.
We all start out as young idealists - you're entitled to that idealism. Once you've circulated in society long enough, reality will slowly shape a different point of view.
For most of us - up to about 20 years old, everything we have has been given to us by our parents (basic sustenance) or the government (our safety and freedoms). When you have to start providing for yourself (which you may be doing now) and participating in setting societies priorities (voting and other activities) you'll have to face the reality of the ill intent of many of those around us.
Enjoy your idealism - we'll welcome you into the real world soon.