Quote:
I see the same 4-5 people doing to same thing and it drives me to drink. It is why i refuse to vote now.
Originally posted by
P'Gell
Thanks, Redbox. I also think limiting how many votes one can give to upgrade people to Advanced Reviewer should not only NOT be rewarded with points, but should be limited to no more than 2 or 3 a month.
I see the same 4 or 5 people voting on ... more
I see the same 4 or 5 people voting on ... more
Thanks, Redbox. I also think limiting how many votes one can give to upgrade people to Advanced Reviewer should not only NOT be rewarded with points, but should be limited to no more than 2 or 3 a month.
I see the same 4 or 5 people voting on EVERY single person who asks for upgrades. Why is this allowed to happen? A few of these reviewers do good work, but the vast majority of them need a lot of work on their reviews and most likely have done only the absolute minimum work to write a review, yet are voted into the Advanced Reviewer program by people, who from the look of it, have NOT read their reviews. I can count on ONE hand the number of people I have voted in who have only 2 or three reviews and are asking for an upgrade. Some people vote that many people in a WEEK! Why is this still being allowed to happen? Are these people voting in alter egos? What would be the impetus to vote for every single person who asks for an upgrade, without even reading their reviews? This is part of the problem.
In the last few weeks I have seen several fairly awful reviews with the comment "GREAT REVIEW!" and an high vote all from the same persons. It only leads me to think a few people are voting on reviews they do not read, people are voting others into the Advanced Reviewer Program without reading those peoples' reviews and that things need to be tightened up to prevent this from continuing to happen.
Also, when a community member reports that they have seen something less than kosher going on, an IP search of the person being reported should be undertaken immediately. The members of the site see A LOT! less
I see the same 4 or 5 people voting on EVERY single person who asks for upgrades. Why is this allowed to happen? A few of these reviewers do good work, but the vast majority of them need a lot of work on their reviews and most likely have done only the absolute minimum work to write a review, yet are voted into the Advanced Reviewer program by people, who from the look of it, have NOT read their reviews. I can count on ONE hand the number of people I have voted in who have only 2 or three reviews and are asking for an upgrade. Some people vote that many people in a WEEK! Why is this still being allowed to happen? Are these people voting in alter egos? What would be the impetus to vote for every single person who asks for an upgrade, without even reading their reviews? This is part of the problem.
In the last few weeks I have seen several fairly awful reviews with the comment "GREAT REVIEW!" and an high vote all from the same persons. It only leads me to think a few people are voting on reviews they do not read, people are voting others into the Advanced Reviewer Program without reading those peoples' reviews and that things need to be tightened up to prevent this from continuing to happen.
Also, when a community member reports that they have seen something less than kosher going on, an IP search of the person being reported should be undertaken immediately. The members of the site see A LOT! less