Yes, I even find this cheap.
Would you pay $0.50 more for a product knowing...
10/24/2012
I would.
10/26/2012
this is a new one
10/27/2012
Of course!
11/10/2012
Safety first! It guided my first toy purchase. Price for safety is a no-brainer.
11/10/2012
I'd probably pay more than that easy knowing it was safe and quality!
11/10/2012
For only 50 cents, of course!
11/12/2012
50 cents isn't very much, so yeah, definitely!
11/12/2012
Quote:
$.50 more....That's not a lot of money. I might pay $.50 more without additional value. Maybe the price should be increased a bit.
Originally posted by
Entropy
I'm a geek. I'm a scientist. I'm curious. Would you pay a little more for a quality toy (i.e. reputable manufacturer, non-porous material) for the assurance that said toy was impervious to medical-grade antimicrobial agents (Cresols,
...
more
I'm a geek. I'm a scientist. I'm curious. Would you pay a little more for a quality toy (i.e. reputable manufacturer, non-porous material) for the assurance that said toy was impervious to medical-grade antimicrobial agents (Cresols, Avagard, Chloroxylenol, and Benzalkonium Chloride, for instance)?
less
11/12/2012
Yes, definitely.
11/15/2012
You should have made the quantity a little bigger, $0.50 extra for safer toys seems kinda low, not saying it is bad! but it'd be interesting to see people's replies when the price was let's say..$20.00 more.
11/27/2012
Absolutely.
11/27/2012
quality and safety is always worth spending more!
11/27/2012
I guess...we tend to avoid chemicals, though. For insertable toys, we buy only products that can be safely cleaned with just soap and water (eg glass, eg silicone...).
11/27/2012
Only 50 cents?
12/04/2012
.50 insurance against a potentially costly medication issue? Heck yes.
12/08/2012
Silicone, glass and steel are good enough for me.
12/10/2012
No chemicals needed for me, thanks. I'm just fine with materials that can be sanitized via boiling etc, and I just use soap and hot water when I'm not sharing. I've never had an issue and don't expect to. If I'm sharing, or using anally, I can use a condom.
12/10/2012
Quote:
I dont see why not
Originally posted by
Entropy
I'm a geek. I'm a scientist. I'm curious. Would you pay a little more for a quality toy (i.e. reputable manufacturer, non-porous material) for the assurance that said toy was impervious to medical-grade antimicrobial agents (Cresols,
...
more
I'm a geek. I'm a scientist. I'm curious. Would you pay a little more for a quality toy (i.e. reputable manufacturer, non-porous material) for the assurance that said toy was impervious to medical-grade antimicrobial agents (Cresols, Avagard, Chloroxylenol, and Benzalkonium Chloride, for instance)?
less
12/10/2012
I would no question.
12/13/2012
If you are only willing to pay $0.50 extra for something like piece of mind the your toy won't be soaking up all the chemicals you can think of then you probably need a shot to the head with a rod gun...
For GUARANTEED safety, I'd be willing to pay quite bit more.
(look at the difference between rubber and platinum silicone)
For GUARANTEED safety, I'd be willing to pay quite bit more.
(look at the difference between rubber and platinum silicone)
12/13/2012
Quote:
For a completely sanitary toy I'd pay a couple of dollars more, let alone 50 cents.
Originally posted by
Entropy
I'm a geek. I'm a scientist. I'm curious. Would you pay a little more for a quality toy (i.e. reputable manufacturer, non-porous material) for the assurance that said toy was impervious to medical-grade antimicrobial agents (Cresols,
...
more
I'm a geek. I'm a scientist. I'm curious. Would you pay a little more for a quality toy (i.e. reputable manufacturer, non-porous material) for the assurance that said toy was impervious to medical-grade antimicrobial agents (Cresols, Avagard, Chloroxylenol, and Benzalkonium Chloride, for instance)?
less
12/16/2012
Yeah, I'd pay a tiny bit extra just to be sure it's safe.
12/16/2012
I'd definitely pay that!
12/17/2012
Quote:
$0.50 is inconsequential to almost everyone.
Originally posted by
Entropy
I'm a geek. I'm a scientist. I'm curious. Would you pay a little more for a quality toy (i.e. reputable manufacturer, non-porous material) for the assurance that said toy was impervious to medical-grade antimicrobial agents (Cresols,
...
more
I'm a geek. I'm a scientist. I'm curious. Would you pay a little more for a quality toy (i.e. reputable manufacturer, non-porous material) for the assurance that said toy was impervious to medical-grade antimicrobial agents (Cresols, Avagard, Chloroxylenol, and Benzalkonium Chloride, for instance)?
less
12/17/2012
.50 is not a big deal when it come to safety.
12/17/2012
Its only .50 so why not
12/18/2012
Quote:
absolutely. i want the best for my body!
Originally posted by
Entropy
I'm a geek. I'm a scientist. I'm curious. Would you pay a little more for a quality toy (i.e. reputable manufacturer, non-porous material) for the assurance that said toy was impervious to medical-grade antimicrobial agents (Cresols,
...
more
I'm a geek. I'm a scientist. I'm curious. Would you pay a little more for a quality toy (i.e. reputable manufacturer, non-porous material) for the assurance that said toy was impervious to medical-grade antimicrobial agents (Cresols, Avagard, Chloroxylenol, and Benzalkonium Chloride, for instance)?
less
12/20/2012
Quote:
Of course I would, hands down without the slightest doubt.
Originally posted by
Entropy
I'm a geek. I'm a scientist. I'm curious. Would you pay a little more for a quality toy (i.e. reputable manufacturer, non-porous material) for the assurance that said toy was impervious to medical-grade antimicrobial agents (Cresols,
...
more
I'm a geek. I'm a scientist. I'm curious. Would you pay a little more for a quality toy (i.e. reputable manufacturer, non-porous material) for the assurance that said toy was impervious to medical-grade antimicrobial agents (Cresols, Avagard, Chloroxylenol, and Benzalkonium Chloride, for instance)?
less
12/21/2012
I buy high quality items only already so this wouldn't matter to me.
12/21/2012