.50 for a safer toy? Absolutely!
Would you pay $0.50 more for a product knowing...
04/11/2012
I'd probably pay more than .50 more.
04/11/2012
quality is the best pollacy
04/12/2012
yup!
04/12/2012
$.50 is really nothing. I'd pay much more than that.
04/23/2012
your putting it near your body so yes safe toys!
04/25/2012
I'm a toy snob. I'd pay twice as much.
Case in point: Doc Johnson Platinum Silicone vs. Tantus Silicone.
Case in point: Doc Johnson Platinum Silicone vs. Tantus Silicone.
04/26/2012
Quote:
Sure.
Originally posted by
Entropy
I'm a geek. I'm a scientist. I'm curious. Would you pay a little more for a quality toy (i.e. reputable manufacturer, non-porous material) for the assurance that said toy was impervious to medical-grade antimicrobial agents (Cresols,
...
more
I'm a geek. I'm a scientist. I'm curious. Would you pay a little more for a quality toy (i.e. reputable manufacturer, non-porous material) for the assurance that said toy was impervious to medical-grade antimicrobial agents (Cresols, Avagard, Chloroxylenol, and Benzalkonium Chloride, for instance)?
less
04/26/2012
For only 50 cents? I'd definitely pay that. Seems like an offer you can refuse!
04/28/2012
50 cents isn't much, so I'm sure most poeple would
04/30/2012
Safety is worth much more than $0.50 so I'd easily pay the little extra.
04/30/2012
$0.50 is nothing! Lol. Of course I would.
04/30/2012
I think it would be worth it.
05/03/2012
yea i would pay $.50 for safer stuff now if you asking me if i would pay $.51 i dont know lol
05/08/2012
most def
05/13/2012
Quote:
right? lol
Originally posted by
unfulfilled
It's only .50 more.
05/13/2012
I definitely would just for the peace of mind.
05/13/2012
I don't know.
I mean they are now discovering that there were a ton of kids toys out there that had caused and are causing a number of problems, and I mean we worry about what kind of lube we use because our vagina's absorb this stuff, we've all talked about quality and many of us make the choice to use only non-pourous toys... isn't adding all this stuff just a little much?
But then again... we don't always know the end result of what we do to our bodies for a long time... I mean P'Gell said it best when women were once using lysol as a douche and as a preventative birth control measure. And hell, how many times have eggs been good for us, been bad for us, been good for us, been bad for us.. and how many people use margarine?
So I don't know if I'd be willing to pay more for this kind of feature.
I mean they are now discovering that there were a ton of kids toys out there that had caused and are causing a number of problems, and I mean we worry about what kind of lube we use because our vagina's absorb this stuff, we've all talked about quality and many of us make the choice to use only non-pourous toys... isn't adding all this stuff just a little much?
But then again... we don't always know the end result of what we do to our bodies for a long time... I mean P'Gell said it best when women were once using lysol as a douche and as a preventative birth control measure. And hell, how many times have eggs been good for us, been bad for us, been good for us, been bad for us.. and how many people use margarine?
So I don't know if I'd be willing to pay more for this kind of feature.
05/13/2012
yup
05/13/2012
Yes.
05/14/2012
Yes I would
05/14/2012
Quote:
What lol?
Originally posted by
Entropy
I'm a geek. I'm a scientist. I'm curious. Would you pay a little more for a quality toy (i.e. reputable manufacturer, non-porous material) for the assurance that said toy was impervious to medical-grade antimicrobial agents (Cresols,
...
more
I'm a geek. I'm a scientist. I'm curious. Would you pay a little more for a quality toy (i.e. reputable manufacturer, non-porous material) for the assurance that said toy was impervious to medical-grade antimicrobial agents (Cresols, Avagard, Chloroxylenol, and Benzalkonium Chloride, for instance)?
less
05/14/2012
Quote:
i most definitely would
Originally posted by
Entropy
I'm a geek. I'm a scientist. I'm curious. Would you pay a little more for a quality toy (i.e. reputable manufacturer, non-porous material) for the assurance that said toy was impervious to medical-grade antimicrobial agents (Cresols,
...
more
I'm a geek. I'm a scientist. I'm curious. Would you pay a little more for a quality toy (i.e. reputable manufacturer, non-porous material) for the assurance that said toy was impervious to medical-grade antimicrobial agents (Cresols, Avagard, Chloroxylenol, and Benzalkonium Chloride, for instance)?
less
05/15/2012
Quote:
Yes, indeed.
Originally posted by
Entropy
I'm a geek. I'm a scientist. I'm curious. Would you pay a little more for a quality toy (i.e. reputable manufacturer, non-porous material) for the assurance that said toy was impervious to medical-grade antimicrobial agents (Cresols,
...
more
I'm a geek. I'm a scientist. I'm curious. Would you pay a little more for a quality toy (i.e. reputable manufacturer, non-porous material) for the assurance that said toy was impervious to medical-grade antimicrobial agents (Cresols, Avagard, Chloroxylenol, and Benzalkonium Chloride, for instance)?
less
05/16/2012
I want a toy that I know will not only last in the long run but I won't get an infection from it either. I always take care of my toys but I still don't want to take that risk.
05/24/2012
for sure. .50 is literally nothing when it comes to ones safety
05/27/2012
Hell yeah I would
05/27/2012
As long as that addition didn't make the product less body safe, then yeah!
05/31/2012
I would pay more for a safer toy
05/31/2012
Of course. I don't even get the question. $.50 really? I just earned that amount in points by posting on the forums.
06/03/2012