Male birth control? Yes or no?

Contributor: vegan.guy vegan.guy
I would love for someone to come up with a reliable, temporary male birth control option that's like the pill.
01/30/2011
Contributor: kawigrl kawigrl
Quote:
Originally posted by El-Jaro
I've heard that this exists, but I'm really doubtful on it. It really seems that the only reason this isn't pushed is that it is thought to emasculate a guy; If he can't produce children, he's less of a man. BUT it's totally ... more
yes it will emasculate a guy, but I'm wondering how safe it is. Birth control alters a hormone cycle that already occurs in women, I wonder if there is a similar biological cycle for the platform for male birth control?
01/30/2011
Contributor: vegan.guy vegan.guy
Quote:
Originally posted by kawigrl
yes it will emasculate a guy, but I'm wondering how safe it is. Birth control alters a hormone cycle that already occurs in women, I wonder if there is a similar biological cycle for the platform for male birth control?
Personally I wouldn't feel emasculated at all, but I'm sure some guys would. And that's a good question.
02/02/2011
Contributor: sexyk515 sexyk515
yes it should not be all on us women
04/05/2011
Contributor: Curves Curves
this is really interesting, i didn't know about this.
04/09/2011
Contributor: P'Gell P'Gell
Quote:
Originally posted by kawigrl
yes it will emasculate a guy, but I'm wondering how safe it is. Birth control alters a hormone cycle that already occurs in women, I wonder if there is a similar biological cycle for the platform for male birth control?
The research being done on oral or injectable male birth control is concentrated on NOT "emasculating" the man using the birth control. (I'm not really sure what you mean by "emasculating" though.) Do female BC methods "Defeminate" women?

There have been male BC methods, but any that have even mild side effects, like a small reduction in semen (not a lack of semen, but a small decrease) or an effect on beard growth and the drug is not approved for use.

Odd, as many of the side effects of female BC pills were known before the Pill was placed on the market, yet none of them were deemed bad enough to prevent FDA approval.....not even the increase in blood clots.

Men's sex drive may vary throughout time, but most men make the same amount of sperm per day. About 200 million for a young, healthy man. The number of semen does decrease (although is still there) as a man becomes older.

The challenge for a mans BC method is to prevent ANY sperm from being made. It is said that preventing one egg from being released is "easier" than preventing all 200 million sperm from being formed, but I'm not really convinced. Some of the reasons past forms of male BC was not approved for release were simply plain sexist.
05/12/2011
Contributor: sexygoddess sexygoddess
Sure why not? lol
05/13/2011
Contributor: ToyGurl ToyGurl
I voted for my fiance. He says yes. Our reasons are that females are not constantly recreating sperm. There are studies testing if birth control can actually harm a females ability to become pregnant. I even heard something from my doctor that I shouldn't stay on it for too long.

Also, females are really tired of doing all the work. We pay for birth control, and all men spend is 7 bucks on a box of condoms. It is very tiring. I pay 45 a month for my pill. It adds up.
05/13/2011
Contributor: starsNairguitars starsNairguitars
My brother was just talking about this.....he wishes that he could have some type of birth control for him because he feels bad about all the responsibility of birth control is on his girlfriend
05/13/2011
Contributor: Rachel Nunez Rachel Nunez
I would try and get him to use it.. lol
05/15/2011
Contributor: K101 K101
I voted no i wouldn't use it, but others could only because I am a female. I think there's absolutely nothing wrong with a man stepping up and taking some of the responsibility. For years, women have been the ones who've had to deal with the majority of the responsibilities in most situations. I think my man would take a male birth control if it was possible. If it wasn't too expensive. Of course, I wouldn't stop taking mine, but that's only because I have to take a specific type to help stop the growth of endometrial tissue. It's a very dangerous medication and he would love to find other options and so would I, but unfortunately, we wouldn't need birth control unless I didn't have endo. 1st of all, I am now unable to have children and we are monogamous so no std worries. I know if it came down to me taking birth control to prevent pregnancy (not for my health condition) or him taking it and taking the risks off me, he'd do it in a heart beat. I've been on it for 7 years so it's effected me majorly. I really think male birth control is a good option.
05/15/2011
Contributor: NarcissisticLust NarcissisticLust
I have talked about this with numerous men and I am disgusted at the answer. Nearly all the men I have discussed male birth control with are appalled by the idea because it "harms their masculinity." The medical risks of men being on birth control is much lower than birth control with estrogen and I wish the men I know could recognize this and stop behaving like they need to piss on everything they own. Sorry about the ranting frustration, but this is something I feel passionate about. To answer your question, yes, I feel how birth control is treated is very sexist.
05/21/2011
Contributor: NarcissisticLust NarcissisticLust
Quote:
Originally posted by Gunsmoke
I can't even imagine that they will find something that doesn't adversely affect a mans health or libido. I'm not going anywhere near this - and I'll be advising my son to stay away as well.
Can you suggest something that will not medically affect a woman's health and libido?
05/21/2011
Contributor: NarcissisticLust NarcissisticLust
Quote:
Originally posted by Saraid
Did you ever encourage your wife to take hormonal birth control? Have you told her to stay away from it as well? If not I would find this very hypocritical.
I agree! And this is why I find birth control sexist, in America at least.
05/21/2011
Contributor: NarcissisticLust NarcissisticLust
Quote:
Originally posted by Kinky Skier
i voted yes but i wouldn't use it, and that is only becuase i assume it would not enable me to shoot a load.

in this sense it emascualtes me, i dont care about not having kids, thats the point, i just want to shoot a nice WHITE, THICK and ... more
I have only read a few articles on male birth control, but here is my understanding. You can still ejaculate, but your semen is not fertile.
05/21/2011
Contributor: NarcissisticLust NarcissisticLust
Quote:
Originally posted by AU
I like the way you think.

I do understand if doctors want to protect themselves from the few ladies that might get mad at them later, but still...it's frustrating that so many people think like that. As a child, people told me I would ... more
Thank you! Many people in my family have chosen not to have children because it wasn't right for the lifestyle they want, but their friends, and even members of the family, frown on their decision and say they will regret or change their mind! This is so frustrating. Just because society wants everyone to join a church, get married, have two kids and buy a home does not make that right. This may not be my place, but I'm glad you realize that you don't want to be barefoot and pregnant just because society, and apparently gynecologists, wants you to make the same choice they do.
05/21/2011
Contributor: NarcissisticLust NarcissisticLust
Quote:
Originally posted by Anally Fixated
There is NO way in hell I would ever take anything that would stop my sperm production. I would be way too afraid of long-term, lasting effects after stopping the medication. This question just scares the crap out of me.
This does not stop sperm production. I am not in the medical field and have only read a few articles on male birth control but my understanding is that you still ejaculate and produce sperm, however they do not carry the necessary information to properly fertilize an egg. While you are on the pill, and for approximately two weeks after, you are infertile, however after that, there will be no lasting side effects and you will be fertile again.
05/21/2011
Contributor: alliegator alliegator
I don't get why reversible vasectomies aren't much more popular. It's a one time cost and doesn't affect the body's natural function, unlike the hormonal birth control so many women use, which is an ongoing cost that really adds up over the years, and can hugely impact how the body works.
07/11/2011
Contributor: bayosgirl bayosgirl
I'm not into hormonal birth control, and I know my husband wouldn't be either. I voted no. And I don't really care if they develop it or not.
07/13/2011
Contributor: Ivy Wilde Ivy Wilde
Quote:
Originally posted by Gunsmoke
I can't even imagine that they will find something that doesn't adversely affect a mans health or libido. I'm not going anywhere near this - and I'll be advising my son to stay away as well.
Would you be okay with your daughter taking the pill to protect her from an unwanted pregnancy? Are you aware of the many adverse side effects that many women on the pill experience?

I think JR's question about birth control being sexist is actually more interesting than the question about male birth control. And I would have to say, that yes, birth control is extremely sexist. Admittedly, the lack of or failure of birth control has a much greater impact on a woman's life than on a man's.

But that doesn't change the fact that is socially acceptable and even expected that a woman will risk her health and well-being to prevent pregnancy, but men are unwilling to take the same risks. Many men even complain about having to use condoms which -- unless you happen to have an allergic reaction to latex -- are completely risk free for the man. There is still the risk of pregnancy for the woman since condoms are still only about 80% effective.
07/13/2011
Contributor: Ivy Wilde Ivy Wilde
Quote:
Originally posted by Daddy'sPuppy
Referring to children as parasites and burden's they cant get rid off, oh how the love shines.
If the pregnancy is unwanted, the fetus IS a parasite and a burden.

Not everyone wants children. Nor should you judge them for not wanting to go through the physical and emotional difficulties of going through with an unwanted pregnancy or making the decision to have an abortion -- which is also physically difficult, just not as bad as a full pregnancy.

You are welcome to believe and feel whatever you want, but don't criticize someone else for their beliefs and feelings.
07/13/2011
Contributor: bayosgirl bayosgirl
Quote:
Originally posted by Ivy Wilde
If the pregnancy is unwanted, the fetus IS a parasite and a burden.

Not everyone wants children. Nor should you judge them for not wanting to go through the physical and emotional difficulties of going through with an unwanted pregnancy or ... more
The "fetus" is a human being. So while you are entitled to your own opinion about abortion, the term "parasite" is offensive to me AND a lot of people.
07/13/2011
Contributor: MJ1337 MJ1337
I'm sure some men would use this as a secondary backup in case a condom broke or their significant other missed their pill. Plus a lot of them would rather take something like a pill if they can avoid using a condom and worry less about a baby in 9 months.
07/13/2011
Contributor: Ghost Ghost
Quote:
Originally posted by alliegator
I don't get why reversible vasectomies aren't much more popular. It's a one time cost and doesn't affect the body's natural function, unlike the hormonal birth control so many women use, which is an ongoing cost that really adds ... more
Because vasectomies are not considered reversible. Some are able to be reversed, but they are the minority, and the likelihood of a successful reversal decreases with time since the original surgery.
07/19/2011
Contributor: Sex'и'Violence Sex'и'Violence
I would definitely use it. The woman shouldn't be the only one holding the burden of contraception, and it beats the hell out of getting snipped.
07/19/2011
Contributor: P'Gell P'Gell
Quote:
Originally posted by alliegator
I don't get why reversible vasectomies aren't much more popular. It's a one time cost and doesn't affect the body's natural function, unlike the hormonal birth control so many women use, which is an ongoing cost that really adds ... more
There is really no such thing as a "reversible vasectomy."

Because not all vasectomies are reversible. It varies by the person, the length of time since the procedure was performed and on some unknown situations. It depends on a lot of factors, most of which can't be determined before the vasectomy is done. Some men form a lot of scar tissue, and in some men even reconnecting the vas deferens won't allow sperm to enter the penis, due to several factors. (Because with a vasectomy, sperm is still being made every day). The procedure simply prevents it from getting to the urethra, in the same way that a tubal ligation prevents the egg from getting into the fallopian tubes. But, most people who choose sterilization simply won't respond to a reversal procedure. Some do, but there's no knowing ahead of time who will respond to a reversal and who won't. (Also, doctors HATE when people want to reverse a sterilization. It was made clear to the patient that this procedure was permanent when they received it first.)

Both a tubal ligation and a vasectomy should be considered permanent forms of birth control. Some people can have them reversed (but insurance doesn't cover it, for obvious reasons) but the majority of people will not regain their fertility. It's actually cheaper to obtain an egg directly from the ovary, as soon as its ripe or remove sperm from behind the section of the vasectomy than to reverse the procedure.
07/19/2011
Contributor: padmeamidala padmeamidala
Quote:
Originally posted by El-Jaro
Thanks for the link! I love to be educated about things!
I had heard the failure rate for a vasectomy was about 25%...was i wrong!

To be honest, I'd rather a pill or something vs. surgery.
A vasectomy is very minor surgery. my Master was in the hospital for only about half an hour and they did a very small incision and it was done. It works good for us because there are no more worries about birth control. He was only off work for a few days and then was back to normal with no complications. I was glad to get off the birth control pill which affected my health a lot.
07/19/2011
Contributor: Lucky21 Lucky21
As I am concerned, this can't happen soon enough. Not only from a fairness perspective, but I wish there were just more options for men. Also, my fiancee has had issues with birth control, and I would love to give it a try and see if it would work better for me.
07/19/2011
Contributor: Beck Beck
It would be great idea then guy would not have to worry if the women is telling truth about taking her birth control pills. He would have his birth control pills. My husband would not want to take any and would not need to anyhow. I have to take it already for cramping.
07/24/2011
Contributor: TheHardOne TheHardOne
If it was safe, I would use it.
09/05/2011