We met two strippers, JFK, and Stalin
Oxford comma and you: Know when to use it.
03/15/2013
I'm an Oxford comma fan, and I like "logical punctuation", too.
03/15/2013
Quote:
Oh My God! I love this!
Originally posted by
El-Jaro
Here's a hint:
03/16/2013
So much love for the Oxford comma. Not being able to use it when I was a journalism major was the absolute fucking worst.
03/26/2013
I was NEVER taught the Oxford comma, which means that 20+ years of education haven't cared about it d=
03/26/2013
Quote:
Both sentences are grammatically correct, yes, but they have different meanings. The general rule in writing is to make your meaning as clear as possible, so if Stalin and JFK were not the two strippers in question, then the comma is needed for clarification. (Also, an apostrophe in "it's" always signifies a contraction of "it is"; the possessive form does not contain an apostrophe.)
Originally posted by
UnknownGirl
It's a trick question. Both sentences are correct. The use to the serial comma is a grammar suggestion not a rule. Mostly it depends on the type of writing in question. There are even differences in it's usage between the various English dialects.
03/27/2013
If JFK and Stalin are not the strippers in question, it is actually clearer and more polished to order it like this:
We met JFK, Stalin, and two strippers.
Or, if you are younger than me:
We met JFK, Stalin and two strippers.
Shut up. I have an English degree and I'm going to use it when I can.
We met JFK, Stalin, and two strippers.
Or, if you are younger than me:
We met JFK, Stalin and two strippers.
Shut up. I have an English degree and I'm going to use it when I can.
03/30/2013
Quote:
JFK and then Stalin with his two strippers?
Originally posted by
SneakersAndPearls
If JFK and Stalin are not the strippers in question, it is actually clearer and more polished to order it like this:
We met JFK, Stalin, and two strippers.
Or, if you are younger than me:
We met JFK, Stalin and two strippers.
Shut ... more
We met JFK, Stalin, and two strippers.
Or, if you are younger than me:
We met JFK, Stalin and two strippers.
Shut ... more
If JFK and Stalin are not the strippers in question, it is actually clearer and more polished to order it like this:
We met JFK, Stalin, and two strippers.
Or, if you are younger than me:
We met JFK, Stalin and two strippers.
Shut up. I have an English degree and I'm going to use it when I can. less
We met JFK, Stalin, and two strippers.
Or, if you are younger than me:
We met JFK, Stalin and two strippers.
Shut up. I have an English degree and I'm going to use it when I can. less
04/01/2013
Quote:
Agreed, agreed! Unless, of course, one is listing them in the order in which they were met.
Originally posted by
SneakersAndPearls
If JFK and Stalin are not the strippers in question, it is actually clearer and more polished to order it like this:
We met JFK, Stalin, and two strippers.
Or, if you are younger than me:
We met JFK, Stalin and two strippers.
Shut ... more
We met JFK, Stalin, and two strippers.
Or, if you are younger than me:
We met JFK, Stalin and two strippers.
Shut ... more
If JFK and Stalin are not the strippers in question, it is actually clearer and more polished to order it like this:
We met JFK, Stalin, and two strippers.
Or, if you are younger than me:
We met JFK, Stalin and two strippers.
Shut up. I have an English degree and I'm going to use it when I can. less
We met JFK, Stalin, and two strippers.
Or, if you are younger than me:
We met JFK, Stalin and two strippers.
Shut up. I have an English degree and I'm going to use it when I can. less
04/01/2013
I like the stripper JFK.
04/01/2013
Total posts: 40
Unique posters: 34
- 1
-
2