I don't know - I never saw Beauty and the Beast as Stockholm Syndrome, which so many people claim it is. The basic breakdown of the dynamics:
The Beast was a spoiled, pampered prince, cursed to take his bestial inner nature as outward form. He is surrounded by meekly fawning servants, who sometimes are a little stern with him, but usually just let him have his own way in everything he does. He does rage and storm at Belle, like he does at everyone else.
Then, Belle calls him on it. She runs away because his yelling scared her (when she snaps that he scared her, notice how shocked he is. He can't even think of a comeback, because it apparently never occurred to him that people were scared of his rages, rather than his looks). He begins shaping up when she makes it clear that his behavior has been absolutely unacceptable. It's giving a second chance, yes, but it takes his genuine effort to change to impress her and earn her love. That's also the key word throughout the story "Earn". In most of the older movies, it was "Win". Win her love, Win the prince, Win win win. Beast had to earn Belle's love by being a good man, and he was able to rise to the challenge.
Gaston, when given the opportunity to try to earn Belle's love, instead demands it. Belle is plain spoken to both of them about the aspects of their behavior that are unacceptable (Beast, his temper, Gaston, his anti-intellectualism). Beast takes stock of himself and decides to improve. Gaston ignores her ultimatum and pushes harder to try to win her by any means possible.
Maybe it's because when I was a young girl, my parents took the time to explain this to me, but I always thought that was a very female-positive message.