The New Intimacy

Would you vote for a candidate who supports outlawing hormonal birth control?

Skip to last post
Set alerts
Updates
Forum search
Contributor: mistressg mistressg
Quote:
Originally posted by indiglo
I would be bedridden 2-3 weeks each month if hormonal bc were outlawed... so I would not support anyone who thought it should be. I can't imagine why anyone would want to outlaw it anyway.
Same. My periods would likely go back to be totally unpredictable, and I would end up blacking out and throwing up at least one week every month. So no, there is no way in hell I would vote for such a candidate.
06/02/2012
Contributor: authorzero authorzero
No. Absolutely not.
06/02/2012
Contributor: <3BF <3BF
No way.
06/02/2012
Contributor: g- g-
Vagina-if you can't say it, don't legislate it!!!!
07/01/2012
Contributor: BoobCopter BoobCopter
Never.
07/01/2012
Contributor: Lilith Bealove Lilith Bealove
Nope.
07/03/2012
Contributor: TheirPet TheirPet
I have dysmenorrhea so my hormonal B/C is very important to me. Also, I like sex and I don't want babbies cause I'm not ready for them. So the politicians can stay out of my business. They're my parts, not theirs.
07/03/2012
Contributor: Sangsara Sangsara
Wow I'm surprised thy even 3% would support this
07/06/2012
Contributor: Yaoi Pervette (deleted) Yaoi Pervette (deleted)
No. Proud supporter of Planned Parenthood here.
07/06/2012
Contributor: Experiment Experiment
Never ever
07/28/2012
Contributor: Moniqua Moniqua
Never.
07/28/2012
Contributor: Leather & Lace Leather & Lace
No! I don't want to be like the Duggar family (no offense), and have a baby year after year.
07/28/2012
Contributor: BlackCrescent BlackCrescent
Absolutely not. The people who are against birth control tend to be conservatives who derive their values from their religious beliefs. I for one do not like to see religious values imposed on the population because secularism should extend into common law to protect the rights of people with different values even if they are a minority within the culture.
08/21/2012
Contributor: satinlady550 satinlady550
Quote:
Originally posted by Rawhide
I'm not a single issue voter, and yes, this election will be mostly determined by economic policy issues. But could you vote for someone who supports (or claims to support) "personhood" laws that would make hormonal birth control illegal?
Another stupid issue that shouldn't even be an issue for consideration for our politicians. There are too many other problems that need to be addressed.
08/22/2012
Contributor: sweetiejo sweetiejo
No I personally wouldn't. There are so many good things about hormonal birth control, besides it just being for birth control.
08/22/2012
Contributor: kitty1949 kitty1949
Absolutely not!
09/06/2012
Contributor: leanright69 leanright69
Outlawed? Who has ever talked about them being outlawed?
09/07/2012
Contributor: sexxxkitten sexxxkitten
Probably not.
09/07/2012
Contributor: Claire-Bear Claire-Bear
That sounds horrible. No way.
09/07/2012
Contributor: edenguy edenguy
Quote:
Originally posted by Rawhide
I'm not a single issue voter, and yes, this election will be mostly determined by economic policy issues. But could you vote for someone who supports (or claims to support) "personhood" laws that would make hormonal birth control illegal?
No way. I support fiscal frugality but this social issue takes it too far.
09/14/2012
Contributor: butts butts
Absolutely not. It helps a lot of people with menstruation and estrogen problems, not just sexually active people. It can hardly even be called just 'birth control' because it's so commonly used for other issues!
09/23/2012
Contributor: tami tami
ITS MY BODY MY CHOICE!!! there is no way some one should be able to tell anyone woman let alone all women that they can not prevent an unwanted pregnancy...If a woman does not want children she should not have to have them and abandon them. Each and every single female out in the entire world should have a choice and there is no way I would ever vote for someone that wants to stop birth control!
09/23/2012
Contributor: JackRaiden JackRaiden
Quote:
Originally posted by Rawhide
Many current Republican candidates for president have gone on record in support for "personhood" amendments, which would outlaw hormonal birth control, among other things. That group includes "Massachusetts moderate" Mitt Romney, ... more
This.

Also: Cherrylane said:

"Not a fuckin chance.

The amount of stupidity and mind-fuckery that would have to be present for that to be legitimately suggested and considered is so obscene I would not care how spot on anything else they had to say was.

No."
09/23/2012
Contributor: Stagger13 Stagger13
Quote:
Originally posted by Rawhide
I'm not a single issue voter, and yes, this election will be mostly determined by economic policy issues. But could you vote for someone who supports (or claims to support) "personhood" laws that would make hormonal birth control illegal?
No-I don't think that is a place for the feds to decide.
09/24/2012
Contributor: ImmortalFantasy ImmortalFantasy
Due to the fact that it would effect me negatively and women in general, I would never support that.
10/02/2012
Contributor: Missmarc Missmarc
Quote:
Originally posted by Rawhide
I'm not a single issue voter, and yes, this election will be mostly determined by economic policy issues. But could you vote for someone who supports (or claims to support) "personhood" laws that would make hormonal birth control illegal?
Nope, I would not.
10/02/2012
Contributor: emiliaa emiliaa
Sweet jesus lord have mercy, NO. Politics are supposed to move us forward, or at least into a better world...not back to one of the darkest times in the equal rights movements. o_O
10/03/2012
Contributor: falalena falalena
Quote:
Originally posted by Rawhide
I'm not a single issue voter, and yes, this election will be mostly determined by economic policy issues. But could you vote for someone who supports (or claims to support) "personhood" laws that would make hormonal birth control illegal?
no. considering that many women i know, myself included, take it for legitimate medical reasons, that would just be ridiculous.
01/20/2013
Contributor: Ren in the rain Ren in the rain
No. Never.
01/21/2013
Contributor: Andrey2052 Andrey2052
No!
02/01/2013