Quote:
I didn't Google the story, but I want to clarify that one paragraph you post is inaccurate and misleading to readers.
Originally posted by
wetone123
I think you will all find this interesting....
Food Rights, Gene Rights and Monsanto: ‘No Food Rights’ Judge quits to work for Monsanto law firm
By Rady Ananda
Global Research, October 13, 2011
Former judge Patrick ... more
Food Rights, Gene Rights and Monsanto: ‘No Food Rights’ Judge quits to work for Monsanto law firm
By Rady Ananda
Global Research, October 13, 2011
Former judge Patrick ... more
I think you will all find this interesting....
Food Rights, Gene Rights and Monsanto: ‘No Food Rights’ Judge quits to work for Monsanto law firm
By Rady Ananda
Global Research, October 13, 2011
Former judge Patrick J. Fiedler now works for Axley Brynelson, LLP, which defended Monsanto against a patent infringement case filed by Australian firm, Genetic Technologies, Ltd. (GTL) in early 2010.
Ruling against raw milk forces consumers to drink genetically modified, antibiotic-laden milk from cows fed an unnatural diet of pesticide-loaded feed. No doubt that makes Monsanto a major fan of Patrick Fiedler.
His decision was rendered on Sept. 9 and he stepped down from the bench on Sept. 30.
This case begs for competent legal counsel who can get the outrageous decision overturned.
ARGUE WITH THAT!!
Google it for a link! less
Food Rights, Gene Rights and Monsanto: ‘No Food Rights’ Judge quits to work for Monsanto law firm
By Rady Ananda
Global Research, October 13, 2011
Former judge Patrick J. Fiedler now works for Axley Brynelson, LLP, which defended Monsanto against a patent infringement case filed by Australian firm, Genetic Technologies, Ltd. (GTL) in early 2010.
Ruling against raw milk forces consumers to drink genetically modified, antibiotic-laden milk from cows fed an unnatural diet of pesticide-loaded feed. No doubt that makes Monsanto a major fan of Patrick Fiedler.
His decision was rendered on Sept. 9 and he stepped down from the bench on Sept. 30.
This case begs for competent legal counsel who can get the outrageous decision overturned.
ARGUE WITH THAT!!
Google it for a link! less
Ruling against raw milk forces consumers to drink genetically modified, antibiotic-laden milk from cows fed an unnatural diet of pesticide-loaded feed.
Raw milk has nothing, zip, zero, nada, to do with hormones/chemicals/ant ib iotics in milk. The term "Raw milk" means that the milk has been pasteurized (heated to kill bacteria) and homogenized (forced through filters to prevent the fats from separating). Drinking raw milk does not mean you will not be exposed to hormones/chemicals/ant ibiotics. Those are administered to the cow to increase milk production which the cow then excretes in its milk. It's misleading and irresponsible to try and make that association.
