Quote:
it's still only your "opinion" that ghosts do not exist. i refer to my earlier statement. learn the difference between fact and opinion. i'm glad that you enjoy hearing yourself talk, but that does not change that for something to be a fact it must be proven. i am not claiming that ghost, in fact, exist. it is my opinion that they do. you are obviously claiming that it is a fact that they do not exist. so, the burden of proof is on you. and, if you think that i am wrong, that, as well, is your opinion. again, learn the difference between fact and opinion. i am an atheist, however, in spite of all the research into religion and it's inability to prove the existance of god, it is still only an opinion that he or she does not exist. anyone who would suggest otherwise is, like you, in need of looking up the definition of "Fact."
Originally posted by
Errant Venture
I'm glad you worded it like that. In truth, it was a poorly worded sentence, written off the cuff. However, I'm simply not going to let a golden opportunity like this pass. Yes, a fact is a provable thing (or a thing been proven not to work,
...
more
I'm glad you worded it like that. In truth, it was a poorly worded sentence, written off the cuff. However, I'm simply not going to let a golden opportunity like this pass. Yes, a fact is a provable thing (or a thing been proven not to work, like homeopathy). Ghosts, god(s) and aliens have not been proven to exist. Now, aliens - scientists working on that. Gods - there's no evidence, despite countless years of theological debate and scientific inquiry, hasn't got very far. Ghosts, after well over a century of thorough research, has yielded absolutely nothing to show for it. Absolutely nothing. Every hypothesis which has been put forward to show the existence of ghosts has failed. So, yes, a fact is a provable thing. It's a provable thing to say that after exhaustive searches, ghosts have been shown to not exist.
While we're on the subject of suggestions, I suggest you look up the burden of proof. I don't have to prove or disprove anything. You, as the claimant, have to. I, as the sceptic, simply have to sit back and wait for you to make your case, review it, and point out any errors and inaccuracies - or state that it's well-founded research with good evidence and a well-reasoned, thought out conclusion. Research into psi, ghosts, ESP and its ilk has never received the latter from any decent scientist. No one, after exhaustive research, has ever proved ghosts, aliens, bigfoot, Nessie, ESP, demons or psychics. Fancy that. So when I say it's a fact that ghosts don't exist, it is certainly not an entirely accurate summation, but for the layman, it'll do. It is a well established fact that all research into such paranormal phenomena has given us ... bugger all.
By the way, I'm not here for points. I'm here for a hopefully decent conversation. Failing that, I'm here to point out the fact that we live in a modern society, which operates on laws of evidence, not superstition that's best left in the middle ages.
This is a public forum. The administrators can do whatever they like with it. They can censor whomever and whatever they want, and that's their right. But if you think I'm going to sit by and let bullshit like this pass then you're sorely mistaken. It is, quite simply, not your place, not your right, to dictate what I can and can't say. Fuck you. less
While we're on the subject of suggestions, I suggest you look up the burden of proof. I don't have to prove or disprove anything. You, as the claimant, have to. I, as the sceptic, simply have to sit back and wait for you to make your case, review it, and point out any errors and inaccuracies - or state that it's well-founded research with good evidence and a well-reasoned, thought out conclusion. Research into psi, ghosts, ESP and its ilk has never received the latter from any decent scientist. No one, after exhaustive research, has ever proved ghosts, aliens, bigfoot, Nessie, ESP, demons or psychics. Fancy that. So when I say it's a fact that ghosts don't exist, it is certainly not an entirely accurate summation, but for the layman, it'll do. It is a well established fact that all research into such paranormal phenomena has given us ... bugger all.
By the way, I'm not here for points. I'm here for a hopefully decent conversation. Failing that, I'm here to point out the fact that we live in a modern society, which operates on laws of evidence, not superstition that's best left in the middle ages.
This is a public forum. The administrators can do whatever they like with it. They can censor whomever and whatever they want, and that's their right. But if you think I'm going to sit by and let bullshit like this pass then you're sorely mistaken. It is, quite simply, not your place, not your right, to dictate what I can and can't say. Fuck you. less
by the way, (i always love when a person throws in a "by the way," like they are about to teach me something) if you want decent conversation, you must allow that other people will have opinions different from you own. and, as long as you treat them as opinions, you will not run into this problem again.
as for letting bullshit like this pass...i beleive it was you who decided to "correct" my statement that someone else's opinion was noted. somehow that set you off. somehow you've decided that my opinion is not worthy of your respect, which is funny. i don't want your respect. i don't need you to validate my opinion. i don't even need you to understand that you are still so very confused about the difference between fact and opinion. you know, i'm bored with this now. continue thinking your opinion is fact. continue enjoying listening to yourself and not to others. arrogance is a wonderful thing.