Do you think stronger gun laws would help reduce gun crimes?

Contributor: HannahPanda HannahPanda
Not at all. People shoot things/other people regardless.
07/21/2012
Contributor: GONE! GONE!
I think there needs to be a bigger crackdown on illegal guns and background checks for those who buy guns legally.
07/21/2012
Contributor: skeeterlynn skeeterlynn
Quote:
Originally posted by deltalima
AGREE!!!
I second that agreement.
07/21/2012
Contributor: P'Gell P'Gell
Quote:
Originally posted by ghalik
This kind of topic just proves how people can't think statistically. OF COURSE gun laws reduce gun crimes. OF COURSE people who are determined to get a weapon illegally will find a way. But stricter laws would prevent so crimes such as those ... more
Thank you! Many people are not able to think statistically and many cannot think logically. The "cold dead hand" contingent knee jerks and thinks gun laws will "outlaw" all weapons. (When that simply isn't the goal of gun control.) They don't understand, as I said earlier, how dangerously easy it is to get semi auto and automatic weapons legally.

Let's see someone kill 12 and wound nearly 70 in about 60 seconds with a knife. Nobody wants to address that. You can't GET automatic weapons in most European countries with logical, intelligent gun laws. WHY can people buy them at a Bass Pro Shop in the USA? And WHY does anyone need them? The only thing they are good for is mowing down a large number of humans in a very short period of time.

This guy in Colorado unloaded several hundred shots in somewhere between 60 and 90 seconds. He bought ALL his guns legally, including the AR15 automatic weapon, which had a magazine drum of 100+ rounds. As THIS is the reason automatic weapons are made, in whose sickened mind is this "sport?"

The knee jerk mentality of people who think sensible gun law will cause their "rights to be taken away" rarely gets into gear when their rights are actually taken away. (For instance most who belong to the NRA support The Patriot Act, one of the "laws" that takes away more rights than any other.) *sigh* They don't get it, when it's right in front of their faces. So so sad. And very disappointing.
07/21/2012
Contributor: P'Gell P'Gell
Quote:
Originally posted by GONE!
I think there needs to be a bigger crackdown on illegal guns and background checks for those who buy guns legally.
This guy in Colorado DID buy all his guns legally and passed all the background checks with flying colors.

NOW WHAT?

If this can happen, again and again, something IS wrong with the laws.
07/21/2012
Contributor: Princess Zelda Princess Zelda
Quote:
Originally posted by kitty1949
No. You know what they say - if there's a will, there's a way.
I agree
07/21/2012
Contributor: unfulfilled unfulfilled
No it wouldn't.
07/21/2012
Contributor: mmike mmike
I voted for stronger gun laws, but what I want specifically is better background/security checks.

People keep talking about how criminals will still get guns, but they keep ignoring the fact that some guns are purchased legally and then used to commit crimes.

We will never have a perfect system, but there needs to be improvements. I'm not content with the current gun laws.
07/21/2012
Contributor: Cookie Monster Mike Cookie Monster Mike
Quote:
Originally posted by Terri69
Do you think stronger gun laws would help reduce gun crimes?
I honestly don't feel it would. It would provide motivation for more groups to start selling weapons on the black market to profit more from the stronger gun laws.
07/21/2012
Contributor: ghent529 ghent529
Quote:
Originally posted by ghalik
This is completely untrue. If we had restrictive gun laws, the suspect would not have been able to purchase the weapons he did.

How exactly does Mexico have more restrictive gun laws?
Yes he would have still been able to get his hands on the guns, because there will always be a way to get stuff like that. and the internet is a big one. and gun laws go by state. Colorado has a lighter set of gun laws (said good morning america) But the suspects background was clean so either way he would have been able to buy the guns. Weather he did it the leagal way or not. In Colorado you don't have to have a CWP to carry a gun in your car, nor do you have to let anyone know it's there unless asked. This is a losing battle, because either way someone (gov, what not) goes about it (same as drugs) they will still be around, and more people will get hurt... it's sad
07/21/2012
Contributor: TheirPet TheirPet
I think we need more laws and enforcement. I lived in a country without guns once and it was pretty nice.
07/21/2012
Contributor: PeaceToTheMiddleEast PeaceToTheMiddleEast
Quote:
Originally posted by P'Gell
This guy in Colorado DID buy all his guns legally and passed all the background checks with flying colors.

NOW WHAT?

If this can happen, again and again, something IS wrong with the laws.
I was just going too speak on this.
07/21/2012
Contributor: ghent529 ghent529
Quote:
Originally posted by P'Gell
Thank you! Many people are not able to think statistically and many cannot think logically. The "cold dead hand" contingent knee jerks and thinks gun laws will "outlaw" all weapons. (When that simply isn't the goal of gun ... more
AR's are sold in walmart, Bass Pro Shop, Cabolo's ect, Because they are used in the sport of hunting deer, bear, and other animals. NOT PEOPLE. I am a hunter, my dad was a hunter, and his dad before him. This is a majority of how my family eats.

The drum with 100 rounds doesn't come stock on that gun he added it to it. and just because someone buys an AR at BPS doesn't mean they are "Hunting Humans"

I really don't care if they do gun control or not. I have all my permits. and will continue to use them for what they are for, Hunting and protection.
07/21/2012
Contributor: Stinkytofu10 Stinkytofu10
Quote:
Originally posted by Terri69
Do you think stronger gun laws would help reduce gun crimes?
No, I don't think it would.
07/21/2012
Contributor: Badass Badass
Quote:
Originally posted by ghalik
Actually Norway does not have particularly strong gun laws. They have a very large population of hunters that prevent such laws from being passed.

The countries with very restrictive gun laws (for example the UK, which completely bans handguns ... more
Dang, this I did not know.
07/21/2012
Contributor: Kissy Kissy
There will always be crazy people. I mean, you can build a bomb still... a gun is just another form of ways to hurt people/things. If someone is psycho they will figure out other ways.
07/21/2012
Contributor: PeachCandy PeachCandy
Unfortunately no...
07/22/2012
Contributor: Allstars316 Allstars316
Got to enforce it better than it is.
07/22/2012
Contributor: Peggi Peggi
Quote:
Originally posted by Terri69
Do you think stronger gun laws would help reduce gun crimes?
Nope, ABSOLUTELY not.

I know far too many people who have purchased guns with no registration on them, illegally, "black market" style. Those guns will NEVER stop being sold and NEVER stop being purchased.

The way I look at it is these criminals will have the guns whether we do or not. If you were them, who would YOU want to rob or murder? The person who you know has a gun, or the one who you know doesn't? Leave us all unprotected and crime is bound to increase.

Guns don't kill people - murderers do.

If it came to it, I'd buy a gun illegally without a second thought in my mind if it meant I am safe.
07/22/2012
Contributor: panthercat23 panthercat23
The laws only help so much, the problem is people are too lax about them and security.
07/22/2012
Contributor: Peggi Peggi
Quote:
Originally posted by P'Gell
Pretty damn hard to kill 12 people and wound more than 60 in 1.5 minutes with a knife, don't you think?

The SPEED and efficiency at which automatic weapons kill is part of the problem.

If "people will find a way" to do ... more
Knives, probably not. But there are plenty (and I mean plenty) of other ways to do it which actually could've been more devastating than the guns he used. I'm GLAD he just used guns, rather than something that could've killed every patron there.
07/22/2012
Contributor: Peggi Peggi
Quote:
Originally posted by ghalik
This kind of topic just proves how people can't think statistically. OF COURSE gun laws reduce gun crimes. OF COURSE people who are determined to get a weapon illegally will find a way. But stricter laws would prevent so crimes such as those ... more
I'd still rather be one of those 2.5 million people whose lives are saved yearly just by owning and carrying a gun
07/22/2012
Contributor: travelnurse travelnurse
I am an Emergency room nurse, I live in Orlando, I am from Denver. I worked the night of Columbine and my friends were working 2 nights ago. Most of the gun shot victims come in from illegal guns anyway. The criminals all have them. I like the right to have guns in my home to protect my family. If you take it away from me, What am I supposed to do when the guy tries to get into my house and he has a gun? It's the same as when they tried prohibition, There was still booze and the thugs made alot more money off of it being illegal.
07/22/2012
Contributor: P'Gell P'Gell
Quote:
Originally posted by ghent529
AR's are sold in walmart, Bass Pro Shop, Cabolo's ect, Because they are used in the sport of hunting deer, bear, and other animals. NOT PEOPLE. I am a hunter, my dad was a hunter, and his dad before him. This is a majority of how my family ... more
You hunt with automatic weapon? Is that actually "sport?" I don't know.

The fact of the matter is, this man DID buy the 100+ drum rounds, he bought them legally and he used them on human beings.

Would hunting be significantly more difficult (assuming of course that... deer aren't armed or wearing Kevlar) if you couldn't get automatic weapons?

I simply don't see the point of them. Would the deer get away or maybe shoot back if you couldn't get hold of automatic weapons? Does it take 300 rounds a second to even KILL a deer?

You see my point, don't you?
07/25/2012
Contributor: Allison.Wilder Allison.Wilder
I think that we have plenty of laws in place that already do no good. If someone wants to be a stupid criminal, they're going to find a way to do it. Criminals don't tend to be so concerned about the laws anyways.
07/25/2012
Contributor: P'Gell P'Gell
Quote:
Originally posted by Allison.Wilder
I think that we have plenty of laws in place that already do no good. If someone wants to be a stupid criminal, they're going to find a way to do it. Criminals don't tend to be so concerned about the laws anyways.
So, we should give up and have NO laws?

The laws we have are inconsistent. And not comprehensive enough.

I say fuck "State's Rights" (which is an argument originally used by Southerners to try to keep slavery legal, it was inconsistent then and it is now) and make the laws Federal. Then ENFORCE them to the fullest extent of the law, including making ownership, buying or selling any and all automatic weapons a felony. Then eliminate "Gun Shows" which are ridiculous because laws are constantly broken and ignored at gun shows, and then enforce and fine the hell out of those who break the new, sensible laws.

OR we can just give up and say, "Oh well, we lose a couple of hundred people a year in these situations. My "right" to vaporize deer with an automatic is more important than saving lives of humans."
07/25/2012
Contributor: pizzahut pizzahut
Quote:
Originally posted by Terri69
Do you think stronger gun laws would help reduce gun crimes?
no cause it dont matter what the law is cause it wont get rid of them
07/25/2012
Contributor: namelesschaos namelesschaos
Quote:
Originally posted by Peggi
I'd still rather be one of those 2.5 million people whose lives are saved yearly just by owning and carrying a gun
The irony of responding to a post saying people can't think statically by misquoting a statistic. There are not "2.5 million lives saved every yearly just by owning and carrying a gun" period. What the study you are referring to actually found was that guns are used defensively 2.5 millions times per year.

The authors very clearly outlined that they had no way of knowing how many of those defensive uses resulted in the saving of a life, very clearly used language throughout the report that referred to preventing loss of property or injury and even asking people if they felt not using a gun would have resulted in a loss of life (not likely to be accurate) only half felt it was significant probability.
07/25/2012
Contributor: P'Gell P'Gell
Quote:
Originally posted by Peggi
I'd still rather be one of those 2.5 million people whose lives are saved yearly just by owning and carrying a gun
Do you have a reference for this? I am not believing these numbers. Sounds like NRA propaganda to me.

References, please. NOT from the NRA, real references. Preferably from a peer reviewed article with statistical analysis.

We're not talking about people like Zimmerman, I hope. He was in NO danger, yet chose to think the law was in his hands. And, a person died.

Statistic aren't about "feelings." Someone "felt they might be in danger." Real numbers. I'm not seeing anywhere near 2.5 million. Misquoting stats doesn't help the "pro gun" cause. Really.
07/25/2012
Contributor: namelesschaos namelesschaos
Quote:
Originally posted by P'Gell
Do you have a reference for this? I am not believing these numbers. Sounds like NRA propaganda to me.

References, please. NOT from the NRA, real references. Preferably from a peer reviewed article with statistical analysis.

We're ... more
He is misrepresent the results as I said above. Here a link to the full text of the study that number comes from: link

Regardless of what side of the debate your on the authors made no attempt to say 2.5 million lives where saved by guns in the study.
07/25/2012