The New Intimacy

Featured by EdenFantasys

Remote controlled vibrating panties
Strap-on vibrators
Butterfly strap-on vibrators
Soap strap-on
Remote control vibrating panties
C-string panty

Are leggings pants?

Skip to last post
Set alerts
Updates
Forum search
Contributor: clockwork451 clockwork451
I don't think so.
Answers (public voting - your screen name will appear in the results):
Yes
Vaginas , Intrepid Niddering , BlooJay , Ivanna , SMichelle , Sera26 , Rossie , Ryuson , Zandrock , tequilafish , Robespierrethecat , Airen Wolf , Bethy Cassatt , michael scofield , Mrs.Tee , pussy licker , h3artsav3r , fizzygato , Girly Juice , jr2012 , ImportPerv , LuckyLady
22  (28%)
No
Kittybit , gloomybear , sillylilkitten , Sinfully , Sweet-n-Playful , K101 , Martiniman , darkr , Terri69 , GONE! , Sirena , Ciao. , Geogeo , Living Doll , ARPKasso , cutesychelsea , Chilipepper , padmeamidala , Kitka , TheirPet , invisiblehat , Lilith Bealove , BrittaniMaree , SexToys-R-Us , Meltingfish , PeaceToTheMiddleEast , xilliannax , LovesAPoet , Adriana Ravenlust , llellsee , LavenderSkies , Gluesnffr , Vanille , indiglo , KyotoAngel , Amanda10 , Creepellah , Voir , sexxxkitten , (k)InkyIvy , Missmarc , lovebites , nikki0668 , TheHardOne , SecretKinksters , pcv , Leather & Lace , Allstars316 , Bignuf , Septimus , Real or memorex , Bleu , Flower1 , toffee , Falsepast , doowop , dv8
57  (72%)
Total votes: 79
Poll is closed
12/06/2012
  • Upgrade Your Hands-Free Play!
  • Long-distance pleasure set for couples
  • Save Extra 20% On Love Cushion And Toy Set!
  • Anal Sub Hook&Rope Kit for $28.99 Only
  • Complete strap-on set for extra 15% off
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
All promotions
Contributor: GingerAnn GingerAnn
Forum highlights on Vibrating panties:

Panty sniffing
Now here's one I haven't seen on here but you'd think is very common. Maybe it's just so benign that people just don't think about it these days....

Sexy Panties: Would you buy...?
It seems like every time I see cute new panties available in the lingerie section, they end up being crotchless. I have nothing against crotchless...

Do you have a panty fetish?
Basically this is targeted at men, but can also be for ladies. I recently wanted to see my boyfriend in my panties so I made him wear them and it was.

Do you wear panties?
Do you wear Panties?

panties
Does it feel good?
12/06/2012
Contributor: Kittybit Kittybit
No they are leggings.
12/07/2012
Contributor: Vaginas Vaginas
yes as long as you cannot see through them. I love wearing them as pants. so comfy. plus your ass looks great
12/07/2012
Contributor: gloomybear gloomybear
no and i think its kinda inappropriate to wear them in public by themselves but that just me i also have a certain hatred of leggings in general because they do not make them for short people...ever
12/07/2012
Contributor: Sinfully Sinfully
Nope.
12/07/2012
Contributor: sillylilkitten sillylilkitten
No, they're fine under long shirts etc. where your ass is covered, but not as pants. That's what yoga pants and skinny jeans are for.
12/07/2012
Contributor: Intrepid Niddering Intrepid Niddering
I've always figured as long as they're opaque, you're fine. When those celebrities were wearing pantyhose as pants.. that was weird.
12/07/2012
Contributor: BlooJay BlooJay
As long as they aren't see through, I think they are pants. They are just thin and tight.
12/07/2012
Contributor: Martiniman Martiniman
Nope
12/07/2012
Contributor: K101 K101
Quote:
Originally posted by clockwork451
I don't think so.
No, they are leggings.

However, I have a few pairs of nice, furry-like lined leggings that are really warm, more comfortable than jeans and NOT see-through, so I can wear them for different occasions during colder months. I usually only wear them with my skirts and dresses to keep warm during cold months, but I've worn them with shirts too, like you would pants, but only if I'm doing something such as tanning or exercise.
12/07/2012
Contributor: darkr darkr
They're fine as long as your shirt covers your ass
12/07/2012
Contributor: Ivanna Ivanna
I think they are considered pants, but I only wear them with a long tunic or a dress. I dont think they look good to wear otherwise.
12/07/2012
Contributor: Terri69 Terri69
No, I don't think so either
12/07/2012
Contributor: GONE! GONE!
Nope
12/07/2012
Contributor: Sirena Sirena
Kind of. If you wear a long enough shirt than yes, but if you wear a regular shirt, then no.
12/07/2012
Contributor: darthkitt3n darthkitt3n
I don't know what to vote. I only wear them if I'm wearing a longer shirt.
12/07/2012
Contributor: Sera26 Sera26
definitely
12/07/2012
Contributor: Rossie Rossie
Yes and no...depends on how you wear it. Get a pair of jeggings, if you want leggings that look like jeans.
12/07/2012
Contributor: Ryuson Ryuson
(Review Program Mentor)
My rule (for 100% opaque leggings)- If the shirt/dress covers my genitals in all situations (when I lift my arms up, walk around, etc.) I wear them as pants. I also only wear long, baggy, tunic-y shirts with them. They look tacky with tank tops unless you're at the gym!
12/07/2012
Contributor: Ciao. Ciao.
Quote:
Originally posted by Ryuson
My rule (for 100% opaque leggings)- If the shirt/dress covers my genitals in all situations (when I lift my arms up, walk around, etc.) I wear them as pants. I also only wear long, baggy, tunic-y shirts with them. They look tacky with tank tops ... more
@Ryuson is exactly where I am on the topic. Leggings aren't pants, but if you can't see through them and they cover the essentials up then I think they are fine.
12/07/2012
Contributor: Geogeo Geogeo
Quote:
Originally posted by clockwork451
I don't think so.
Nooooo. It bothers me when people wear them as pants. Under dresses, sure. not with only a shirt, at work, you're an adult. Yeesh
12/07/2012
Contributor: Living Doll Living Doll
No. They're leggings.
12/07/2012
Contributor: Ryuson Ryuson
(Review Program Mentor)
Quote:
Originally posted by Geogeo
Nooooo. It bothers me when people wear them as pants. Under dresses, sure. not with only a shirt, at work, you're an adult. Yeesh
I would NEVER wear them at work under a shirt! Gah! My boss over the summer would have fired me. I totally was talking about around town and at school, I agree with you that that they're not 'work' pants.
12/07/2012
Contributor: cutesychelsea cutesychelsea
Definitely not pants. I only wear mine with super long shirts/short dresses -- you know, the ones that are just slightly too short to be worn without anything under them
12/07/2012
Contributor: Zandrock Zandrock
They can be. If worn with the right outfit and they are the right color and not transparent
12/07/2012
Contributor: tequilafish tequilafish
Whatever dude, as long as your genitals aren't showing wear whatever you want for pants.
12/07/2012
Contributor: Chilipepper Chilipepper
Never liked them, even when they were popular back in the 1980's.

Funny, all I heard in the 90's was "THANK GOD THEY'RE NOT POPULAR ANYMORE!!!" and then ... they're popular again. Same thing with gauchos. *shakes head*

Anyway, I don't consider them pants, I consider them a foundation garment meant to be layered with (long shirt/blouse, short dress, etc).
12/07/2012
Contributor: Kitka Kitka
I don't consider them pants, something to wear underneath a skirt or shorts or something like that, sure.
12/07/2012
Contributor: TheirPet TheirPet
I don't think they're pants.
12/07/2012