The New Intimacy

Excuse me, Ma'am, but are your legs on backwards?

Skip to last post
Set alerts
Updates
Forum search
Contributor: SubmissiveFeminist SubmissiveFeminist
The shadow looks like a belly button but that's her back. Weird, it does looks backwards, though. Nice eye. =p
03/17/2012
Contributor: richsam richsam
Quote:
Originally posted by AndroAngel
So, I was looking through the lingerie section of the site, and I came upon these thigh highs... Something about the image bothered me, so I looked, and I looked, then I realized: Is it just me, or does the image show the front of this woman's ... more
thats a wierd pic
04/04/2012
Contributor: Nissa Nissa Nissa Nissa
Yep. Photoshop-ed too heavily.
04/04/2012
Contributor: ViVix ViVix
Quote:
Originally posted by AndroAngel
So, I was looking through the lingerie section of the site, and I came upon these thigh highs... Something about the image bothered me, so I looked, and I looked, then I realized: Is it just me, or does the image show the front of this woman's ... more
The dimple looks like a bellybutton, but where are the women with real legs in these things anyway?!
06/02/2012
Contributor: Nora29714 Nora29714
Quote:
Originally posted by js250
Sorry, she just has no butt. That is her ass and back of her legs.
I agree! sorry
06/02/2012
Contributor: roskat roskat
Terrible use of photoshop but cute stockings, though!
06/02/2012
Contributor: SumFun75 SumFun75
Quote:
Originally posted by AndroAngel
So, I was looking through the lingerie section of the site, and I came upon these thigh highs... Something about the image bothered me, so I looked, and I looked, then I realized: Is it just me, or does the image show the front of this woman's ... more
OMG your right, it does look like that.. LOL
11/05/2012
Contributor: Pururin Pururin
That's definitely her backside, though I can see how it looks like her front with her legs on backwards. Thanks for pointing it out; I had a good chuckle. :]
11/07/2012
Contributor: Sexy Desire Sexy Desire
I too thought the same thing, but I agree it's because she had no butt that really makes it questionable. However, it still is a nice photo.
12/20/2012
Contributor: Robert Paulson Robert Paulson
Obviously they are not backwards...
12/27/2012
Contributor: PropertyOfPotter PropertyOfPotter
It's absolutely her backside, but it does look a little off!
12/27/2012
Contributor: SassySam SassySam
Quote:
Originally posted by Jimbo Jones
I think the thing that throws it off is the dimple in the center of her lower back that resembles a navel. That and the fact that she has no ass. I think it is her backside.
yeah that's what got me, the back/navel.
01/29/2013
Contributor: joolie joolie
Glad I'm not just being a jerk for thinking the stock photo was edited very badly!
01/31/2013
Contributor: hut22dunn2 hut22dunn2
Quote:
Originally posted by AndroAngel
So, I was looking through the lingerie section of the site, and I came upon these thigh highs... Something about the image bothered me, so I looked, and I looked, then I realized: Is it just me, or does the image show the front of this woman's ... more
Lol it looks like it
02/01/2013
Contributor: hut22dunn2 hut22dunn2
Quote:
Originally posted by wetone123
When I was younger and very thin, people teased me and called me "No Butt"! I believe that's the case here. This model just has no butt to her! I'm glad I have a nice curvy butt now! Butt yes, it does look quite unusual for a model ... more
I agree lol
02/01/2013
Contributor: Marie Hanna Marie Hanna
Its just that she has no butt.
02/02/2013