I think the feederism is extremely unhealthy, but it's good to accept your body. Everyone should still aim to exercise and be healthy, not necessarily thin, but healthy. I know many people struggle with weight, myself included, and while I exercise to lose weight, I accept where I am right now knowing where I want to be.
#SummerPleasure - #SexIs - Is “Fat Acceptance” Just As Dangerous as “Thinspiration”?
06/29/2012
Quote:
that's the point that always sticks in my craw, how do you decide if someone needs to be encouraged? Few people have access to other people's medical charts and no one outside of close friends and family knows their diet and lifestyle, making any judgements on heath based entirely by appearance.
Originally posted by
P'Gell
Thank you. I agree, people should be kindly encouraged to become healthy. KINDLY being the key concept.
Not to be mean, it's just I'm somewhat overweight (6 foot man, 250ish) and I exercise 5 times a week, yet I get the idea people think I'm unhealthy. When people say "we should encourage them to live healthy lives" I hear "I don't have any knowledge about this person's lifestyle other than their physical appearance, let's go tell them how to live their life!"
06/29/2012
Chances are, if someone is overweight, they know. Reminding them of this, making them feel bad, telling them they're unhealthy - none of that is going to help. If you really care about their health, offer to go the gym with them - and if you don't know them that well, you should not be commenting on their weight in the first place.
Also, they don't owe you their health. If they are comfortable with their body, and know it could lead to health problems, you really have no business commenting - if they don't realise there's an associated health risk, then sure, mention that - but otherwise, it's their body, leave them alone.
I really REALLY REALLY don't like other people telling me what to do with my body.
Also, they don't owe you their health. If they are comfortable with their body, and know it could lead to health problems, you really have no business commenting - if they don't realise there's an associated health risk, then sure, mention that - but otherwise, it's their body, leave them alone.
I really REALLY REALLY don't like other people telling me what to do with my body.
06/30/2012
Quote:
Oh, OK. Cool. I misread you.
Originally posted by
T&A1987
which is why i said i wasn't referring to the extreme cases, I agree with you on that on that.
06/30/2012
Quote:
If someone asks for encouragement in personal relationships. I wouldn't say anything to someone who was overweight and not asking for encouragement. That would be rude.
Originally posted by
T&A1987
that's the point that always sticks in my craw, how do you decide if someone needs to be encouraged? Few people have access to other people's medical charts and no one outside of close friends and family knows their diet and lifestyle,
...
more
that's the point that always sticks in my craw, how do you decide if someone needs to be encouraged? Few people have access to other people's medical charts and no one outside of close friends and family knows their diet and lifestyle, making any judgements on heath based entirely by appearance.
Not to be mean, it's just I'm somewhat overweight (6 foot man, 250ish) and I exercise 5 times a week, yet I get the idea people think I'm unhealthy. When people say "we should encourage them to live healthy lives" I hear "I don't have any knowledge about this person's lifestyle other than their physical appearance, let's go tell them how to live their life!" less
Not to be mean, it's just I'm somewhat overweight (6 foot man, 250ish) and I exercise 5 times a week, yet I get the idea people think I'm unhealthy. When people say "we should encourage them to live healthy lives" I hear "I don't have any knowledge about this person's lifestyle other than their physical appearance, let's go tell them how to live their life!" less
Also, things like Public Service Ads and TV shows that advocate healthy living can be helpful. People can watch them if they are interested, or not, if they are not.
06/30/2012
Quote:
I agree about public service ads, except they tend to focus more on the weight loss aspect than healthy living. While I understand this is what people are more interested in, it has two problems. One it turns the goal from healthy living to weight loss, so people focus less on healthy diets, moderate exercise and general wellness and more on extreme ways of losing weight. Two, it may give thin people a false sense of security regarding their health, IE "I'm thin, so I'm healthy."
Originally posted by
P'Gell
If someone asks for encouragement in personal relationships. I wouldn't say anything to someone who was overweight and not asking for encouragement. That would be rude.
Also, things like Public Service Ads and TV shows that advocate ... more
Also, things like Public Service Ads and TV shows that advocate ... more
If someone asks for encouragement in personal relationships. I wouldn't say anything to someone who was overweight and not asking for encouragement. That would be rude.
Also, things like Public Service Ads and TV shows that advocate healthy living can be helpful. People can watch them if they are interested, or not, if they are not. less
Also, things like Public Service Ads and TV shows that advocate healthy living can be helpful. People can watch them if they are interested, or not, if they are not. less
06/30/2012
Quote:
Definitely the focus should be on encouraging people to engage in healthy eating. Everyone deserves a food splurge once in a while, but overall healthy food, as fresh as possible should be the goal. There are people who don't eat anything that doesn't come out of a box a bag or a can. Fresh healthy food should be a priority.
Originally posted by
T&A1987
I agree about public service ads, except they tend to focus more on the weight loss aspect than healthy living. While I understand this is what people are more interested in, it has two problems. One it turns the goal from healthy living to weight
...
more
I agree about public service ads, except they tend to focus more on the weight loss aspect than healthy living. While I understand this is what people are more interested in, it has two problems. One it turns the goal from healthy living to weight loss, so people focus less on healthy diets, moderate exercise and general wellness and more on extreme ways of losing weight. Two, it may give thin people a false sense of security regarding their health, IE "I'm thin, so I'm healthy."
less
Bringing one's weight to a healthy set point (which is different for every person) will be a result of healthy food intake. But, just losing weight, by any means neccesary shouldn't be the goal of any Public Service Ads.
06/30/2012
I think the diet industry influences what is considered 'overweight'. In fact I am very strong and healthy but my BMI says I'm overweight.
Staying stable is the key - I've been the same 200-210 lbs for about 15 years. On the other hand my wife yo-yos up and down a couple of times per year - that's what's dangerous.
I have no doubt that obesity can be a problem, it's just that we can't legislate what people eat or what people think about one another.
Staying stable is the key - I've been the same 200-210 lbs for about 15 years. On the other hand my wife yo-yos up and down a couple of times per year - that's what's dangerous.
I have no doubt that obesity can be a problem, it's just that we can't legislate what people eat or what people think about one another.
06/30/2012
Quote:
I had a nasty comment posted but I think I will walk a high road and play nice. Some people do have glandular/endocrine problems that make losing weight more than any gentle persuasion can help. Some of us struggle every day just to keep doing the things our minds tell us we should be able to do. Before you pass judgement perhaps walk a few days in their shoes.
Originally posted by
P'Gell
If someone asks for encouragement in personal relationships. I wouldn't say anything to someone who was overweight and not asking for encouragement. That would be rude.
Also, things like Public Service Ads and TV shows that advocate ... more
Also, things like Public Service Ads and TV shows that advocate ... more
If someone asks for encouragement in personal relationships. I wouldn't say anything to someone who was overweight and not asking for encouragement. That would be rude.
Also, things like Public Service Ads and TV shows that advocate healthy living can be helpful. People can watch them if they are interested, or not, if they are not. less
Also, things like Public Service Ads and TV shows that advocate healthy living can be helpful. People can watch them if they are interested, or not, if they are not. less
06/30/2012
I never heard for this before
07/01/2012
Quote:
I think it's more important to educate people about the BMI, and being overweight can be very dangerous. After living in the US for a while, I can see why it's so easy to become overweight here. Fresh healthy food is so much more expensive than processed food. People should have easy access to healthy life style if they want to, it shouldn't be so dependent on their financial situation. I wish more money can go into providing people with healthier life style if they desire it.
Originally posted by
Ansley
Summer Pleasure: Is “Fat Acceptance” Just As Dangerous as “Thinspiration”?
You may have heard about sites that are "pro-ana". The content and mission of sites like this is to encourage eating disorders in impressionable ... more
Summer Pleasure: Is “Fat Acceptance” Just As Dangerous as “Thinspiration”?
You may have heard about sites that are "pro-ana". The content and mission of sites like this is to encourage eating disorders in impressionable people. It mostly targets women, but men can be affected by eating disorders as well. Sites like Pinterest and Google + have blocked people from posting content from known sites and it's just one step in the right direction.
Then, there's the flip side of the coin - what Roland carefully calls "fat acceptance". There are organizations pushing to end the bullying of people who are overweight and/or obese. While their intentions may be good, Roland questions the notion. He believes most obese Americans are not "fat & fit". Rather, they are the typical couch potato people often joke about under their breath.
Before you bring out the pitchforks and torches, it should be said that Roland is calling for a general acceptance of everyone. Yet, it should be said that being overweight and unfit is opening the door to a sundry of health issues.
It's also become a fetish. There are many sites that cater towards men who love big, beautiful women and the women they admire. There's a much darker side to that, however. There is an extreme fetish called feederism. Where men ask women to gain as much weight as they possibly can. It's an eye-opening reality in this day and age. Knowing that being overweight drastically increases your chance of diabetes and other major heath concerns one can't help but wonder, how far is too far? What say you, Edenites? How far is too far? less
Summer Pleasure: Is “Fat Acceptance” Just As Dangerous as “Thinspiration”?
You may have heard about sites that are "pro-ana". The content and mission of sites like this is to encourage eating disorders in impressionable ... more
Summer Pleasure: Is “Fat Acceptance” Just As Dangerous as “Thinspiration”?
You may have heard about sites that are "pro-ana". The content and mission of sites like this is to encourage eating disorders in impressionable people. It mostly targets women, but men can be affected by eating disorders as well. Sites like Pinterest and Google + have blocked people from posting content from known sites and it's just one step in the right direction.
Then, there's the flip side of the coin - what Roland carefully calls "fat acceptance". There are organizations pushing to end the bullying of people who are overweight and/or obese. While their intentions may be good, Roland questions the notion. He believes most obese Americans are not "fat & fit". Rather, they are the typical couch potato people often joke about under their breath.
Before you bring out the pitchforks and torches, it should be said that Roland is calling for a general acceptance of everyone. Yet, it should be said that being overweight and unfit is opening the door to a sundry of health issues.
It's also become a fetish. There are many sites that cater towards men who love big, beautiful women and the women they admire. There's a much darker side to that, however. There is an extreme fetish called feederism. Where men ask women to gain as much weight as they possibly can. It's an eye-opening reality in this day and age. Knowing that being overweight drastically increases your chance of diabetes and other major heath concerns one can't help but wonder, how far is too far? What say you, Edenites? How far is too far? less
07/01/2012
I've been a fat girl my entire life and I know everything about the bullying, having low self esteem, and feeling completely aliented. I have pics of me as a little kid and I was even chubby back then! I'm really struggling with my weight at the moment. I believe that people should treat plus size people with respect and dignity just like they would anybody else. If that's what the movement really is than I'm all for it. Getting healthy should be encouraged (but don't shove it down my throat please!) Just because someone is fat people shouldn't attack them by bullying them and making them feel bad or by telling them, "hey, you need to work out!" I don't like groups that actually encourage being fat or treating it like it's the next best thing because it's not. Being overweight is bad for your health! I don't like groups that encourage fat people to stay fat or get fatter. I think everyone should have healthy goals in mind. I love curvy bodies though but not when it's unhealthy.
I think that people think that if they make fun of fat people it will motivate them to work out. Well, it doesn't work that way! It just makes you feel depressed, miserable, and worthless. Being constantly told that you need to work out doesn't work either because it's annoying and it almost feels like they're attacking you with the obvious. Ugh. The only thing that really helps is if someone offers you to help you by working out with you.
Another thing that really makes me upset is how guys treat you like a fetish object. I'm a plus size woman and I demand respect and love just like any other woman. I'm not some fetish toy.
I think that people think that if they make fun of fat people it will motivate them to work out. Well, it doesn't work that way! It just makes you feel depressed, miserable, and worthless. Being constantly told that you need to work out doesn't work either because it's annoying and it almost feels like they're attacking you with the obvious. Ugh. The only thing that really helps is if someone offers you to help you by working out with you.
Another thing that really makes me upset is how guys treat you like a fetish object. I'm a plus size woman and I demand respect and love just like any other woman. I'm not some fetish toy.
07/02/2012
The article actually pissed me off a fair bit. And the bit in this post mixing up a fat fetish with fat acceptance is just fucking stupid. Nothing wrong with having a fetish or kink or attraction for fat people, but it's not the same thing.
I could spell out all the reasons FA is a good cause with solid science and compassion behind it, but Kate Harding has done so for me already: Read her excellent post here. In fact, just go read all of The Shapely Prose archive
I would also add the fat acceptance has helped me so much as a person to overcome tremendous self-hatred, doubt, and (yes!) even disordered eating.
I could spell out all the reasons FA is a good cause with solid science and compassion behind it, but Kate Harding has done so for me already: Read her excellent post here. In fact, just go read all of The Shapely Prose archive
I would also add the fat acceptance has helped me so much as a person to overcome tremendous self-hatred, doubt, and (yes!) even disordered eating.
07/02/2012
I've heard of it before, and I find it just as unhealthy as pro-ana/pro-mia websites...
07/02/2012
Quote:
There is a fine line between healthy and unhealthy but I don't think is is okay to say that its okay to be overweight. Its not healthy.
Originally posted by
Ansley
Summer Pleasure: Is “Fat Acceptance” Just As Dangerous as “Thinspiration”?
You may have heard about sites that are "pro-ana". The content and mission of sites like this is to encourage eating disorders in impressionable ... more
Summer Pleasure: Is “Fat Acceptance” Just As Dangerous as “Thinspiration”?
You may have heard about sites that are "pro-ana". The content and mission of sites like this is to encourage eating disorders in impressionable people. It mostly targets women, but men can be affected by eating disorders as well. Sites like Pinterest and Google + have blocked people from posting content from known sites and it's just one step in the right direction.
Then, there's the flip side of the coin - what Roland carefully calls "fat acceptance". There are organizations pushing to end the bullying of people who are overweight and/or obese. While their intentions may be good, Roland questions the notion. He believes most obese Americans are not "fat & fit". Rather, they are the typical couch potato people often joke about under their breath.
Before you bring out the pitchforks and torches, it should be said that Roland is calling for a general acceptance of everyone. Yet, it should be said that being overweight and unfit is opening the door to a sundry of health issues.
It's also become a fetish. There are many sites that cater towards men who love big, beautiful women and the women they admire. There's a much darker side to that, however. There is an extreme fetish called feederism. Where men ask women to gain as much weight as they possibly can. It's an eye-opening reality in this day and age. Knowing that being overweight drastically increases your chance of diabetes and other major heath concerns one can't help but wonder, how far is too far? What say you, Edenites? How far is too far? less
Summer Pleasure: Is “Fat Acceptance” Just As Dangerous as “Thinspiration”?
You may have heard about sites that are "pro-ana". The content and mission of sites like this is to encourage eating disorders in impressionable ... more
Summer Pleasure: Is “Fat Acceptance” Just As Dangerous as “Thinspiration”?
You may have heard about sites that are "pro-ana". The content and mission of sites like this is to encourage eating disorders in impressionable people. It mostly targets women, but men can be affected by eating disorders as well. Sites like Pinterest and Google + have blocked people from posting content from known sites and it's just one step in the right direction.
Then, there's the flip side of the coin - what Roland carefully calls "fat acceptance". There are organizations pushing to end the bullying of people who are overweight and/or obese. While their intentions may be good, Roland questions the notion. He believes most obese Americans are not "fat & fit". Rather, they are the typical couch potato people often joke about under their breath.
Before you bring out the pitchforks and torches, it should be said that Roland is calling for a general acceptance of everyone. Yet, it should be said that being overweight and unfit is opening the door to a sundry of health issues.
It's also become a fetish. There are many sites that cater towards men who love big, beautiful women and the women they admire. There's a much darker side to that, however. There is an extreme fetish called feederism. Where men ask women to gain as much weight as they possibly can. It's an eye-opening reality in this day and age. Knowing that being overweight drastically increases your chance of diabetes and other major heath concerns one can't help but wonder, how far is too far? What say you, Edenites? How far is too far? less
07/02/2012
Quote:
It's not "fucking stupid". It's bringing to light all of the facets of a topic. And there is something wrong with having a fetish that encourages unhealthy behaviors in people.
Originally posted by
carenautilus
The article actually pissed me off a fair bit. And the bit in this post mixing up a fat fetish with fat acceptance is just fucking stupid. Nothing wrong with having a fetish or kink or attraction for fat people, but it's not the same
...
more
The article actually pissed me off a fair bit. And the bit in this post mixing up a fat fetish with fat acceptance is just fucking stupid. Nothing wrong with having a fetish or kink or attraction for fat people, but it's not the same thing.
I could spell out all the reasons FA is a good cause with solid science and compassion behind it, but Kate Harding has done so for me already: Read her excellent post here. In fact, just go read all of The Shapely Prose archive
I would also add the fat acceptance has helped me so much as a person to overcome tremendous self-hatred, doubt, and (yes!) even disordered eating. less
I could spell out all the reasons FA is a good cause with solid science and compassion behind it, but Kate Harding has done so for me already: Read her excellent post here. In fact, just go read all of The Shapely Prose archive
I would also add the fat acceptance has helped me so much as a person to overcome tremendous self-hatred, doubt, and (yes!) even disordered eating. less
Having a "fat fetish" and having a "feederism fetish" are two completely different things, feederism being the utmost extreme of the spectrum.
It's really awesome that you were able to overcome those things. I don't think what we're saying here is that fat acceptance itself is a bad thing, it's the rogue members of the movement who encourage people to remain unhealthy (if they are unhealthy) and those who take that to an extreme.
Would you support a fetish that encouraged women or men to be anorexic or bulimic?
07/03/2012
Quote:
Honey, I didn't say I agreed with everything I was taught in Nursing School. There was no harm intended. Most studies have shown "glandular" issues play a role, but are not completely written on stone. Yes, people with a low thyroid are going to have a more difficult time losing weight, as will those of us in Peri-menopause.
Originally posted by
Airen Wolf
I had a nasty comment posted but I think I will walk a high road and play nice. Some people do have glandular/endocrine problems that make losing weight more than any gentle persuasion can help. Some of us struggle every day just to keep doing the
...
more
I had a nasty comment posted but I think I will walk a high road and play nice. Some people do have glandular/endocrine problems that make losing weight more than any gentle persuasion can help. Some of us struggle every day just to keep doing the things our minds tell us we should be able to do. Before you pass judgement perhaps walk a few days in their shoes.
less
I'm not judging at all. I'm just saying "difficult doesn't mean impossible." For some of us, it's hard work also, some people's set weight is naturally higher than others. Airen, honey, I think you completely missed what I was saying.
I certainly didn't mean to hurt you nor anyone else.
I simply don't think we should give young women, or anyone the idea that they can never lose weight, so don't bother to try. And, this happening in some situations. We shouldn't encourage people to give up and remain overweight anymore than we should encourage Pro-Ana movements or Pro-Bulimia movements. Don't you agree?
Everyone should strive for optimal health, for some it will be a tougher fight than others. That doesn't make it impossible to be as healthy as one can be. One can have a higher Set Weight and be healthy, but we need to be careful with encouraging unhealthy eating and unhealthy bodies, especially in young people. I've seen people do it with their kids, "Clean your plate." "You don't want what I cooked? I slaved all day. Eat it!" "You're not hungry? What's wrong with you? Eat anyway." "You'll never lose weight, none of the women in our family can, don't even bother." I've heard people say these things to their children and I think its terribly abusive. It's as abusive as encouraging a young woman to starve herself.
THAT was my point. Some have a harder time than others, but a "hard time" doesn't mean a lost cause.
I certainly never meant any harm to you or anyone else. It didn't occur to me that my carefully chosen words would be taken in such a way.
07/03/2012
I think people should try to stay at a healthy weight (or at least try to) that's between "fat" and "skinny" depending on one's own build. I think there is something to be said about body acceptance though. You have to love the body you're in and the shape your in.
07/03/2012
Quote:
This is a very interesting discussion, if you don't mind me playing devil's advocate, what if the person engaging of the unhealthy behavior does so of her or his own free will? People who gain because it's their fetish, not someone else'? If that's okay, then it's the act of submitting that's the problem, not the actual unhealthiness. If that's the case, is any act of submission, or dangerous/potentially dangerous submission bad? Even if the person, in both instances submits of his/her free will? If the problem isn't the submission, but the overall unhealthiness of the fetish, then where's the line? Where is it decided which consenting fetishes are appropriate and which are not?
Originally posted by
Ansley
It's not "fucking stupid". It's bringing to light all of the facets of a topic. And there is something wrong with having a fetish that encourages unhealthy behaviors in people.
Having a "fat fetish" and having a ... more
Having a "fat fetish" and having a ... more
It's not "fucking stupid". It's bringing to light all of the facets of a topic. And there is something wrong with having a fetish that encourages unhealthy behaviors in people.
Having a "fat fetish" and having a "feederism fetish" are two completely different things, feederism being the utmost extreme of the spectrum.
It's really awesome that you were able to overcome those things. I don't think what we're saying here is that fat acceptance itself is a bad thing, it's the rogue members of the movement who encourage people to remain unhealthy (if they are unhealthy) and those who take that to an extreme.
Would you support a fetish that encouraged women or men to be anorexic or bulimic? less
Having a "fat fetish" and having a "feederism fetish" are two completely different things, feederism being the utmost extreme of the spectrum.
It's really awesome that you were able to overcome those things. I don't think what we're saying here is that fat acceptance itself is a bad thing, it's the rogue members of the movement who encourage people to remain unhealthy (if they are unhealthy) and those who take that to an extreme.
Would you support a fetish that encouraged women or men to be anorexic or bulimic? less
07/03/2012
Quote:
I don't mind at all. I love it when people play devil's advocate.
Originally posted by
T&A1987
This is a very interesting discussion, if you don't mind me playing devil's advocate, what if the person engaging of the unhealthy behavior does so of her or his own free will? People who gain because it's their fetish, not someone
...
more
This is a very interesting discussion, if you don't mind me playing devil's advocate, what if the person engaging of the unhealthy behavior does so of her or his own free will? People who gain because it's their fetish, not someone else'? If that's okay, then it's the act of submitting that's the problem, not the actual unhealthiness. If that's the case, is any act of submission, or dangerous/potentially dangerous submission bad? Even if the person, in both instances submits of his/her free will? If the problem isn't the submission, but the overall unhealthiness of the fetish, then where's the line? Where is it decided which consenting fetishes are appropriate and which are not?
less
In every situation, excess of anything is always a bad thing. As with anything in life, you have to know where to draw the line and the line should be made within one's own mind.
However, I can't say that every act of submission I have seen has been out of want. Instead, there have been many scenarios I've seen in my own personal experiences with acts of submission where someone is submitting out of fear. Fear of loss, fear of rejection, fear of humiliation...those are not "healthy" fears. Those are fears sprung from insecurity and I think playing on one's insecurities to indulge your own sexual fantasy is never a good thing.
So, right - where IS the line? Objectively the line is drawn when one's actions begin to affect people who weren't asking to be involved. And this is just a single, hypothetical scenario but say you have a woman who loves food and she wants to be seen as a goddess for ingesting as much as she can for the enjoyment of others. She's not married, she doesn't have any kids, and she's pretty much not into being social with the world and is happy living in this way. She's not hurting anyone except for herself.
Scenario two is a bit different. A woman has a husband, she has a family and young children whom rely on her to be healthy and strong. She has this same fetish and spends her days gratifying this fetish to the point where she is confined to one room and her family has to take care of her hand and foot. This is harmful to her children and her marriage.
I think that's where the line is drawn. Of course, there are factors thrown in to make it easier to drawn the line between the two and nothing in this world is so black and white.
Ultimately, I will always feel like people should make their own decisions and be who they need to be in life in order to make it through the day to day crap. But, I cannot stop myself from wondering if there are any underlying issues involved.
We are taught the default human state is happy. Then, when we ask what happy means, we're told to define it for ourselves. When we say that we are unhappy, we are told to do things that make us happy. But, never not one time have I ever seen a textbook definition of what happiness is (outside of the American Dream, natch. /sarcasm).
I don't know...I think this is ultimately what it means to be open-minded, but I still can't help but wish people would want more and better for themselves in all aspects of life. And more pointedly, I wish they had the means to get those things. *goes off to ponder the topic more introspectively*
07/03/2012
Quote:
Reading the "fucking stupid" comment kind of shut me down in a way and I didn't really know how to reply. I just don't like the way men have treated me in the past like I'm some sort of a strange creature/fetish. They just come right up to you and hit on you and think you like it/understand it for some reason. I actually remember feeling really turned off and annoyed by guys like these. Thank goodness my boyfriend is accepting of my body but he doesn't necessarily have a fetish for my weight or anything like that. He encourages me to be healthy. I have no idea how/where/why men have this kink but it's not healthy because they are encouraging bad health for the other person (dangerous!) which reminded me of the topic of fat acceptance. Of course people with a fat fetish are "accepting" of overweight people because they want them to stay fat or get even fatter. It's terrible for your health and I definitely think it's crossing the line. I think that this group of people might actually take part in these extreme fat acceptance type groups that don't encourage you to get healthy but to stay the same and just accept it. It was just a thought. =/
Originally posted by
Ansley
It's not "fucking stupid". It's bringing to light all of the facets of a topic. And there is something wrong with having a fetish that encourages unhealthy behaviors in people.
Having a "fat fetish" and having a ... more
Having a "fat fetish" and having a ... more
It's not "fucking stupid". It's bringing to light all of the facets of a topic. And there is something wrong with having a fetish that encourages unhealthy behaviors in people.
Having a "fat fetish" and having a "feederism fetish" are two completely different things, feederism being the utmost extreme of the spectrum.
It's really awesome that you were able to overcome those things. I don't think what we're saying here is that fat acceptance itself is a bad thing, it's the rogue members of the movement who encourage people to remain unhealthy (if they are unhealthy) and those who take that to an extreme.
Would you support a fetish that encouraged women or men to be anorexic or bulimic? less
Having a "fat fetish" and having a "feederism fetish" are two completely different things, feederism being the utmost extreme of the spectrum.
It's really awesome that you were able to overcome those things. I don't think what we're saying here is that fat acceptance itself is a bad thing, it's the rogue members of the movement who encourage people to remain unhealthy (if they are unhealthy) and those who take that to an extreme.
Would you support a fetish that encouraged women or men to be anorexic or bulimic? less
If you're overweight with a partner with a fetish for your body type it makes me a little scared for that person. They might eat more and gain more just for their partner so that they feel loved and accepted. Maybe it would get to a point where the only beauty and self worth they think they have is their overweight body. I've heard women say they are proud of their curves (which is sexy and fabulous! I love curvy women!) but to what extent? If you're morbidly obese I don't think it's anything to be proud of or to flaunt especially if you have high blood pressure, diabetes, ect.
You might be getting away with your weight for now but it will eventually catch up with you. I've been fat my entire life and I'm 24 now. I have high blood pressure and both of my parents are diabetic so I have to pay a lot more attention now because it's just going to get worse if I don't do anything. It's really hard. =[ I'm struggling but doing my best. When fat people tell me to be proud of my body and not do anything to change... pffft.
07/04/2012
Quote:
I agree that acts of submission under coercion, whether of physical or emotional abuse is wrong, but that’s because I’m not a monster. The coercion scenario, which might be the most common, I don’t know, but it’s also the easiest to answer, which is glad you continued on. Too often with questions like this, people answer the easy, obvious question, when there are many more difficult ones under the surface.
Originally posted by
Ansley
I don't mind at all. I love it when people play devil's advocate.
In every situation, excess of anything is always a bad thing. As with anything in life, you have to know where to draw the line and the line should be made within ... more
In every situation, excess of anything is always a bad thing. As with anything in life, you have to know where to draw the line and the line should be made within ... more
I don't mind at all. I love it when people play devil's advocate.
In every situation, excess of anything is always a bad thing. As with anything in life, you have to know where to draw the line and the line should be made within one's own mind.
However, I can't say that every act of submission I have seen has been out of want. Instead, there have been many scenarios I've seen in my own personal experiences with acts of submission where someone is submitting out of fear. Fear of loss, fear of rejection, fear of humiliation...those are not "healthy" fears. Those are fears sprung from insecurity and I think playing on one's insecurities to indulge your own sexual fantasy is never a good thing.
So, right - where IS the line? Objectively the line is drawn when one's actions begin to affect people who weren't asking to be involved. And this is just a single, hypothetical scenario but say you have a woman who loves food and she wants to be seen as a goddess for ingesting as much as she can for the enjoyment of others. She's not married, she doesn't have any kids, and she's pretty much not into being social with the world and is happy living in this way. She's not hurting anyone except for herself.
Scenario two is a bit different. A woman has a husband, she has a family and young children whom rely on her to be healthy and strong. She has this same fetish and spends her days gratifying this fetish to the point where she is confined to one room and her family has to take care of her hand and foot. This is harmful to her children and her marriage.
I think that's where the line is drawn. Of course, there are factors thrown in to make it easier to drawn the line between the two and nothing in this world is so black and white.
Ultimately, I will always feel like people should make their own decisions and be who they need to be in life in order to make it through the day to day crap. But, I cannot stop myself from wondering if there are any underlying issues involved.
We are taught the default human state is happy. Then, when we ask what happy means, we're told to define it for ourselves. When we say that we are unhappy, we are told to do things that make us happy. But, never not one time have I ever seen a textbook definition of what happiness is (outside of the American Dream, natch. /sarcasm).
I don't know...I think this is ultimately what it means to be open-minded, but I still can't help but wish people would want more and better for themselves in all aspects of life. And more pointedly, I wish they had the means to get those things. *goes off to ponder the topic more introspectively* less
In every situation, excess of anything is always a bad thing. As with anything in life, you have to know where to draw the line and the line should be made within one's own mind.
However, I can't say that every act of submission I have seen has been out of want. Instead, there have been many scenarios I've seen in my own personal experiences with acts of submission where someone is submitting out of fear. Fear of loss, fear of rejection, fear of humiliation...those are not "healthy" fears. Those are fears sprung from insecurity and I think playing on one's insecurities to indulge your own sexual fantasy is never a good thing.
So, right - where IS the line? Objectively the line is drawn when one's actions begin to affect people who weren't asking to be involved. And this is just a single, hypothetical scenario but say you have a woman who loves food and she wants to be seen as a goddess for ingesting as much as she can for the enjoyment of others. She's not married, she doesn't have any kids, and she's pretty much not into being social with the world and is happy living in this way. She's not hurting anyone except for herself.
Scenario two is a bit different. A woman has a husband, she has a family and young children whom rely on her to be healthy and strong. She has this same fetish and spends her days gratifying this fetish to the point where she is confined to one room and her family has to take care of her hand and foot. This is harmful to her children and her marriage.
I think that's where the line is drawn. Of course, there are factors thrown in to make it easier to drawn the line between the two and nothing in this world is so black and white.
Ultimately, I will always feel like people should make their own decisions and be who they need to be in life in order to make it through the day to day crap. But, I cannot stop myself from wondering if there are any underlying issues involved.
We are taught the default human state is happy. Then, when we ask what happy means, we're told to define it for ourselves. When we say that we are unhappy, we are told to do things that make us happy. But, never not one time have I ever seen a textbook definition of what happiness is (outside of the American Dream, natch. /sarcasm).
I don't know...I think this is ultimately what it means to be open-minded, but I still can't help but wish people would want more and better for themselves in all aspects of life. And more pointedly, I wish they had the means to get those things. *goes off to ponder the topic more introspectively* less
The “other people who didn’t ask to be involved” may be the perfect place to draw the line, or at least a great one. As for happiness, I think why it’s the metric and why it’s so vague is because if some is happy, truly happy and not just kidding themselves, it’s because they’ve accomplished what they wanted. For example, when you say “but I still can't help but wish people would want more and better for themselves in all aspects of life” that puts other people up to your expectations of them, which is no way to live. On the one hand, I can understand seeing someone’ life desires, I’m not going to list an example, because I’ll probably insult someone and being disappointed in them for aiming so low, but on the other hand, who are we to decide what someone should aspire to?
Complicated question, but at least they’re being asked.
I agree that acts of submission under coercion, whether of physical or emotional abuse is wrong, but that’s because I’m not a monster. The coercion scenario, which might be the most common, I don’t know, but it’s also the easiest to answer, which is glad you continued on. Too often with questions like this, people answer the easy, obvious question, when there are many more difficult ones under the surface.
The “other people who didn’t ask to be involved” may be the perfect place to draw the line, or at least a great one. As for happiness, I think why it’s the metric and why it’s so vague is because if some is happy, truly happy and not just kidding themselves, it’s because they’ve accomplished what they wanted. For example, when you say “but I still can't help but wish people would want more and better for themselves in all aspects of life” that puts other people up to your expectations of them, which is no way to live. On the one hand, I can understand seeing someone’ life desires, I’m not going to list an example, because I’ll probably insult someone and being disappointed in them for aiming so low, but on the other hand, who are we to decide what someone should aspire to?
Complicated questions, but at least they’re being asked.
07/04/2012
Quote:
Who would enjoy being objectified like that when it was clear they weren't entirely happy with their body? It's kind of like fetishizing (I swear I will get this word into the dictionary if it kills me) transsexuals, especially MTF transsexuals. Saying things like "it's the best of both worlds".
Originally posted by
VioletMoonstone
Reading the "fucking stupid" comment kind of shut me down in a way and I didn't really know how to reply. I just don't like the way men have treated me in the past like I'm some sort of a strange creature/fetish. They just
...
more
Reading the "fucking stupid" comment kind of shut me down in a way and I didn't really know how to reply. I just don't like the way men have treated me in the past like I'm some sort of a strange creature/fetish. They just come right up to you and hit on you and think you like it/understand it for some reason. I actually remember feeling really turned off and annoyed by guys like these. Thank goodness my boyfriend is accepting of my body but he doesn't necessarily have a fetish for my weight or anything like that. He encourages me to be healthy. I have no idea how/where/why men have this kink but it's not healthy because they are encouraging bad health for the other person (dangerous!) which reminded me of the topic of fat acceptance. Of course people with a fat fetish are "accepting" of overweight people because they want them to stay fat or get even fatter. It's terrible for your health and I definitely think it's crossing the line. I think that this group of people might actually take part in these extreme fat acceptance type groups that don't encourage you to get healthy but to stay the same and just accept it. It was just a thought. =/
If you're overweight with a partner with a fetish for your body type it makes me a little scared for that person. They might eat more and gain more just for their partner so that they feel loved and accepted. Maybe it would get to a point where the only beauty and self worth they think they have is their overweight body. I've heard women say they are proud of their curves (which is sexy and fabulous! I love curvy women!) but to what extent? If you're morbidly obese I don't think it's anything to be proud of or to flaunt especially if you have high blood pressure, diabetes, ect.
You might be getting away with your weight for now but it will eventually catch up with you. I've been fat my entire life and I'm 24 now. I have high blood pressure and both of my parents are diabetic so I have to pay a lot more attention now because it's just going to get worse if I don't do anything. It's really hard. =[ I'm struggling but doing my best. When fat people tell me to be proud of my body and not do anything to change... pffft. less
If you're overweight with a partner with a fetish for your body type it makes me a little scared for that person. They might eat more and gain more just for their partner so that they feel loved and accepted. Maybe it would get to a point where the only beauty and self worth they think they have is their overweight body. I've heard women say they are proud of their curves (which is sexy and fabulous! I love curvy women!) but to what extent? If you're morbidly obese I don't think it's anything to be proud of or to flaunt especially if you have high blood pressure, diabetes, ect.
You might be getting away with your weight for now but it will eventually catch up with you. I've been fat my entire life and I'm 24 now. I have high blood pressure and both of my parents are diabetic so I have to pay a lot more attention now because it's just going to get worse if I don't do anything. It's really hard. =[ I'm struggling but doing my best. When fat people tell me to be proud of my body and not do anything to change... pffft. less
I think oft more than not, when someone continually encourages unhealthy behavior in someone it's to prevent themselves from losing self-esteem, or more to the point making sure that the person they're discouraging doesn't rise in self-esteem. It's a wicked game to play, and I don't think everyone realizes it as it's happening but a little introspection every now and again never hurt anyone.
07/05/2012
Quote:
wow, cut and paste mistake, whoops.
Originally posted by
T&A1987
I agree that acts of submission under coercion, whether of physical or emotional abuse is wrong, but that’s because I’m not a monster. The coercion scenario, which might be the most common, I don’t know, but it’s also the easiest to answer, which is
...
more
I agree that acts of submission under coercion, whether of physical or emotional abuse is wrong, but that’s because I’m not a monster. The coercion scenario, which might be the most common, I don’t know, but it’s also the easiest to answer, which is glad you continued on. Too often with questions like this, people answer the easy, obvious question, when there are many more difficult ones under the surface.
The “other people who didn’t ask to be involved” may be the perfect place to draw the line, or at least a great one. As for happiness, I think why it’s the metric and why it’s so vague is because if some is happy, truly happy and not just kidding themselves, it’s because they’ve accomplished what they wanted. For example, when you say “but I still can't help but wish people would want more and better for themselves in all aspects of life” that puts other people up to your expectations of them, which is no way to live. On the one hand, I can understand seeing someone’ life desires, I’m not going to list an example, because I’ll probably insult someone and being disappointed in them for aiming so low, but on the other hand, who are we to decide what someone should aspire to?
Complicated question, but at least they’re being asked.
I agree that acts of submission under coercion, whether of physical or emotional abuse is wrong, but that’s because I’m not a monster. The coercion scenario, which might be the most common, I don’t know, but it’s also the easiest to answer, which is glad you continued on. Too often with questions like this, people answer the easy, obvious question, when there are many more difficult ones under the surface.
The “other people who didn’t ask to be involved” may be the perfect place to draw the line, or at least a great one. As for happiness, I think why it’s the metric and why it’s so vague is because if some is happy, truly happy and not just kidding themselves, it’s because they’ve accomplished what they wanted. For example, when you say “but I still can't help but wish people would want more and better for themselves in all aspects of life” that puts other people up to your expectations of them, which is no way to live. On the one hand, I can understand seeing someone’ life desires, I’m not going to list an example, because I’ll probably insult someone and being disappointed in them for aiming so low, but on the other hand, who are we to decide what someone should aspire to?
Complicated questions, but at least they’re being asked. less
The “other people who didn’t ask to be involved” may be the perfect place to draw the line, or at least a great one. As for happiness, I think why it’s the metric and why it’s so vague is because if some is happy, truly happy and not just kidding themselves, it’s because they’ve accomplished what they wanted. For example, when you say “but I still can't help but wish people would want more and better for themselves in all aspects of life” that puts other people up to your expectations of them, which is no way to live. On the one hand, I can understand seeing someone’ life desires, I’m not going to list an example, because I’ll probably insult someone and being disappointed in them for aiming so low, but on the other hand, who are we to decide what someone should aspire to?
Complicated question, but at least they’re being asked.
I agree that acts of submission under coercion, whether of physical or emotional abuse is wrong, but that’s because I’m not a monster. The coercion scenario, which might be the most common, I don’t know, but it’s also the easiest to answer, which is glad you continued on. Too often with questions like this, people answer the easy, obvious question, when there are many more difficult ones under the surface.
The “other people who didn’t ask to be involved” may be the perfect place to draw the line, or at least a great one. As for happiness, I think why it’s the metric and why it’s so vague is because if some is happy, truly happy and not just kidding themselves, it’s because they’ve accomplished what they wanted. For example, when you say “but I still can't help but wish people would want more and better for themselves in all aspects of life” that puts other people up to your expectations of them, which is no way to live. On the one hand, I can understand seeing someone’ life desires, I’m not going to list an example, because I’ll probably insult someone and being disappointed in them for aiming so low, but on the other hand, who are we to decide what someone should aspire to?
Complicated questions, but at least they’re being asked. less
07/05/2012
Quote:
That's why I lean more towards "Health at Any Size" than I do true "Fat Acceptance". I figure that learning healthy eating/exercise habits will help make you feel better either way, but there's so much more to health than numbers on a scale. A 100 lb woman who's stressed to the max and is able to eat entire pints of ice cream without gaining an ounce isn't healthy either.
Originally posted by
Smokedawg
I don't have a problem with the fat acceptance movement. What I do have a problem with, and have seen more and more often, are people who are overweight who browbeat people who express a desire to change their eating and activity habits to reduce
...
more
I don't have a problem with the fat acceptance movement. What I do have a problem with, and have seen more and more often, are people who are overweight who browbeat people who express a desire to change their eating and activity habits to reduce fat and/or become more fit. Some people in the fat acceptance movement are endorsing and encouraging people to remain obese, which is every bit as bad as thin people pressuring people to be (or remain) overly underweight/lean/thin.
Acceptance means accepting that people WILL sometimes want to change their body shape/level of fitness/etc. and have every right to do so (and not be judged as traitors for doing so).
"Acceptance" movements of most types eventually begin to breed fanatics who proselytize unhealthy and/or unpleasant things, and their numbers sometimes grow fast and they can exert a great deal of negative influence. less
Acceptance means accepting that people WILL sometimes want to change their body shape/level of fitness/etc. and have every right to do so (and not be judged as traitors for doing so).
"Acceptance" movements of most types eventually begin to breed fanatics who proselytize unhealthy and/or unpleasant things, and their numbers sometimes grow fast and they can exert a great deal of negative influence. less
Also, as for:
"There is a fine line between healthy and unhealthy but I don't think is is okay to say that its okay to be overweight. Its not healthy." (indiechick)
I have to question your definition of "overweight". According to the "BMI Charts", I would have to get back to my Seventh Grade Weight in order to clock in at a "healthy weight". My high school marching band, could run laps on the track, mostly healthy weight? Yeah, I was officially obese, and that was the thinnest, healthiest, best looking I've ever been. I have no problem with discussing the idea of "overweight", but I refuse to trust charts that have been crafted by the insurance and diet industries to skew people's perceptions of what is healthy.
07/06/2012
Total posts: 55
Unique posters: 29
- 1
-
2