Worse than original wand
While I had high expectations of this product, it was nothing close. I would take the original over the XL version. The original has it's own flaws (small diameter and short length) so I would look for a different line of prostate/scrotum toys.
Published:
Pros
Relatively cheap
Larger diameter than original
Vibration is good enough
Larger diameter than original
Vibration is good enough
Cons
Flexibility = no fun
I have tried the original and this XL and I, unfortunately, like the original pleasure wand|Men's pleasure wand details better. The original is smaller but much harder. With the original, I felt a pressure all the way down my shaft. The prostate part didn't feel like it was inserting far enough so I cut off most of the scrotum massager part. This ruined the toy. I found that the scrotum massager is the main pleasure for me. I haven't been using my original (but modified) toy because it doesn't produce the same sensation without that extra nub in front.
I was hoping to replace the original with something larger for more pleasure. However, I was disappointed in the XL. You can't see it from the picture, but the scrotum massager part is very flexible. It's so flexible, that it's just about useless. After I was done with the toy, cleaned it, and was putting it back in the box, the scrotum part got caught in the box. It was turned completely around (i.e. making an S shape). This shows you how unfortunately flexible this is.
The XL version shares the same design flaw as the original in that it's always easy to slide out. It feels best when it's pressed all the way in, but it's hard to keep it there especially if you prefer to lie down with this toy inserted. I don't understand why they didn't make this more like a butt plug so it stays in place. Even though I knew this, I still tried out the XL version. The pleasure derived from the scrotum massager (on the original only) plus prostate massager is definitely enough to overrule that design flaw.
What made the original wand successful is exactly what's missing from the XL version. It feels like a short vibrator with a flapping piece of plastic in front.
I was hoping to replace the original with something larger for more pleasure. However, I was disappointed in the XL. You can't see it from the picture, but the scrotum massager part is very flexible. It's so flexible, that it's just about useless. After I was done with the toy, cleaned it, and was putting it back in the box, the scrotum part got caught in the box. It was turned completely around (i.e. making an S shape). This shows you how unfortunately flexible this is.
The XL version shares the same design flaw as the original in that it's always easy to slide out. It feels best when it's pressed all the way in, but it's hard to keep it there especially if you prefer to lie down with this toy inserted. I don't understand why they didn't make this more like a butt plug so it stays in place. Even though I knew this, I still tried out the XL version. The pleasure derived from the scrotum massager (on the original only) plus prostate massager is definitely enough to overrule that design flaw.
What made the original wand successful is exactly what's missing from the XL version. It feels like a short vibrator with a flapping piece of plastic in front.
This content is the opinion of the submitting contributor and is not endorsed by EdenFantasys.com
EdenFantasys Review Program
- Get Free Toys
- Enjoy Special Deals
Comments
Subscribe to comments
-
It's interesting. The original wand is made out of rubber and this one is made out of hygenically superior, yet softer, TPR silicone. I guess material safety can't be the only thing one goes on when picking out a toy if a particular sensation is desired. It's too bad this didn't work out for you, but I appreciate the comparison review that you provide here.
Forum
No discussions yet.
- See all discussions
Thank you for viewing Men's pleasure wand XL – prostate massager discontinued review page!