What? Eden doesn't sell those.

Actually, Eden does sell Jimmyjane Chroma, and a lot of other JJ vibes. They don't actually state what the vibrator is on that other site..

EF just doesn't sell the "artist etched collection." For good reason, I cannot imagine dropping $1620 (on sale for 1300$ this month, big discount -cough - ) for the same vibrator but with different colors and etchings on them.



I mean, especially with such a low-power.

That is not rechargeable.



I feel like that is just flushing money down the toilet!! WOW.

1650? whoa. No way

The entire point of that price tag is specifically the art, not the vibrator itself, regardless of power or charging capability. This issue is reinforced by the fact that the six vibrators are functionally identical instead of the set containing a variety of different kinds of vibrators. Each set of vibrators comes in boxed collector's packaging and they're numbered. I don't see why anyone who didn't collect Jamie Hewlett's work would even consider buying the set. An average consumer spending $1650 just on some vibrator that happens to have some etching is crazy compared to a fan spending $1650 on a "collectible" that happens to have the form of a vibrator, for whatever artistic reason. Of course, I've seen rich people spend more than $1650 on a pair of shoes or on lunch so the value of $1650 is relative, but I still wouldn't expect a rich person to buy this set nonchalantly without having a specific desire for the artwork.

I'd be surprised if any fans who bought the set actually used the vibrators instead of leaving them in a display case to remain in mint condition. That would be like standing hours in line to pay $200 for some limited edition plastic action figure at Comic-Con in order to open the box and play with the toy. Heck, even some Nike shoes are sold for artistic design and aren't intended for actual wear.

If $1650 for vibrators seems crazy, it's more common to see an art gallery charge much more money for some hand-painted vinyl Dunny figurine.

lol, no. If I had $1,650 to splurge with I'd get myself a makeover before a vibrator that may or may not work for me.

never. if it fell it my lap i would totally enjoy having it. not worth the money. good product though.

Assuming I had the money... still no. Doesn't make much sense to spend that much on six of the same item. With that kind of cash, I could get a bunch of items off of my wishlists instead.

Same!

I wholeheartedly agree!! Especially when it's such a slim, simple type of toy.

Wow. If I had like millions of dollars maybe..

Who says that these toys are supposed to be enjoyed for more than aesthetics? If they're collectors' items, then that's what they are regardless of form. The concept isn't unusual: some action figures are released as limited editions and collectors will keep them mint and unopened although their form suggests that they should be played with by children. Some comic books have limited edition covers; heck, for some issues, collectors will leave a first edition print in mint condition and purchase a later edition to read. I've seen people buy two copies of a book at a book signing so one can get signed and stay near-mint and the other one can be read. If you want more extravagance, some people collect limited-run Nike shoes and don't wear them. Of course, some people collect cars and keep them safe in a personal show room rather than drive them.

I think it's kinda cool to consider sex toys a collectors item, but at the same time it makes no sense at all! Why have musical artist sign them? Why not famous porn stars or people in the industry. But yeah, sems a little out there in every direction you look at it.