Hi
I just returned to the Product Review program after an extended break and for the first time utilized the new format.
While I do like it and understand how it helps break things down more clearly. I also suspect it might be causing me to write a little too much.
No one wants to bore their readers and I feel that in this fast-pace modern world people might prefer shorter and more concise reviews.
Do you think that this Review might be too verbose. Or do you think it hits the sweet spot just right.
Btw this is my own review so I'm not criticizing anyone else. Just want to get an idea about what people think.
Plus I think it might help others who are trying to get a clearer idea about review lengths. EF suggests 300-800 words per review, but I have noticed that those who tend to wander on the lower side of that spectrum overwhelmingly get "not very useful" rating. While some where the person spends less time describing and reviewing the program and more time giving a long personal anecdote, tend to get better rating.
I understand that those reviews seem personal and often incorporate great humor in their writing. Hence, making the review a better read. But isn't the job of actually reviewing the product more important than ones grasp of creative writing.
Once again this is the Review up for debate. And once again I am not criticizing anyone, just myself — so don't hold back any punches!
PS: You can choose multiple choices.
I just returned to the Product Review program after an extended break and for the first time utilized the new format.
While I do like it and understand how it helps break things down more clearly. I also suspect it might be causing me to write a little too much.
No one wants to bore their readers and I feel that in this fast-pace modern world people might prefer shorter and more concise reviews.
Do you think that this Review might be too verbose. Or do you think it hits the sweet spot just right.
Btw this is my own review so I'm not criticizing anyone else. Just want to get an idea about what people think.
Plus I think it might help others who are trying to get a clearer idea about review lengths. EF suggests 300-800 words per review, but I have noticed that those who tend to wander on the lower side of that spectrum overwhelmingly get "not very useful" rating. While some where the person spends less time describing and reviewing the program and more time giving a long personal anecdote, tend to get better rating.
I understand that those reviews seem personal and often incorporate great humor in their writing. Hence, making the review a better read. But isn't the job of actually reviewing the product more important than ones grasp of creative writing.
Once again this is the Review up for debate. And once again I am not criticizing anyone, just myself — so don't hold back any punches!
PS: You can choose multiple choices.