I personally, feel that the same rules of puncuation and grammar apply, even in the summary section of my review. However, almost every single review I "edit" I notice the reviewer doesn't capitalize letters--even after a period--in the summary section. Another thing that I see with almost every review is that there are no commas or periods between the "pros" and "cons." Is it just me or is the summary section OK without capitalization and puncuation?
I also want to ask, do you personally use commas or periods in your "summary" section? I understand no using a comma when you do the "pros" and "cons" in a list style. But what about capitalizing the first word or the word after a period? Why isn't that hardly ever done in the summary section?
I'm not complaining by no means, I'm just really curious. Maybe I do things differently. For the other editors, do ya'll ask the reviewer to revise the summary when there's no capitalization or puncuation where it is needed?
I also want to ask, do you personally use commas or periods in your "summary" section? I understand no using a comma when you do the "pros" and "cons" in a list style. But what about capitalizing the first word or the word after a period? Why isn't that hardly ever done in the summary section?
I'm not complaining by no means, I'm just really curious. Maybe I do things differently. For the other editors, do ya'll ask the reviewer to revise the summary when there's no capitalization or puncuation where it is needed?