For the second time in 12 hours I've encountered a review that has appalling spelling and grammar errors. One had a glaring misspelling and total breakdown of grammar in the summary alone. (I won't address comma usage since some people feel that is grammar-nazism.)
On both reviews I left a comment because I don't like to leave ratings below useful without an explanation (please note, I judged them on content, not grammar). However, I've also handed out two "poor" ratings to editors and I wish there was a public place to state why.
My reasons for wanting it public are:
1. If the editor responds that his or her changes were undone by the reviewer, everyone should know that. It's not fair for readers to rate an editor on something that is not their doing.
2. If some readers are giving an editor an "excellent" vote for the same review I'm giving a "poor" vote, then something is wrong and I think the best way to solve it is to have an area for discussion of the editing.
This is the criteria EF provides for voting on editing:
If you found no errors while reading, the editor did an 'excellent' job. If you found one error or a few areas that were questionable, but overall the review was well read, the editor did a 'good' job. If you found two or more obvious errors, the editor did a 'poor' job.
The review I just marked poor had "it was not faltering on me" in the summary. Without doubt that should have been "flattering" — so at least one mistake, there were more — yet two people have rated the editing as "excellent" so far.
On both reviews I left a comment because I don't like to leave ratings below useful without an explanation (please note, I judged them on content, not grammar). However, I've also handed out two "poor" ratings to editors and I wish there was a public place to state why.
My reasons for wanting it public are:
1. If the editor responds that his or her changes were undone by the reviewer, everyone should know that. It's not fair for readers to rate an editor on something that is not their doing.
2. If some readers are giving an editor an "excellent" vote for the same review I'm giving a "poor" vote, then something is wrong and I think the best way to solve it is to have an area for discussion of the editing.
This is the criteria EF provides for voting on editing:
If you found no errors while reading, the editor did an 'excellent' job. If you found one error or a few areas that were questionable, but overall the review was well read, the editor did a 'good' job. If you found two or more obvious errors, the editor did a 'poor' job.
The review I just marked poor had "it was not faltering on me" in the summary. Without doubt that should have been "flattering" — so at least one mistake, there were more — yet two people have rated the editing as "excellent" so far.