Quote:
Originally posted by
edeneve
Not just alleged allegations. BlackOrchid didn't make a typo about that. You can Google it, not hard to find a lot of info. about it.
Yes, BlackOrchid, respect isn't commonly associated w/ the porn industry. I fell for his 'respect' image too.
Gosh, on film, nailing one woman with two closed-fisted punches to her face and then ripping apart her anus so they had to stop the scene because of all the blood and it required many stitches to repair her...there's no excuse, but all supposedly because she called him a son-of-a-bitch during the scene? WTF?! And going for anal, again, on film, with another when explicitly told no anal in the contract, and repeatedly by her, during the scene...then getting high-fived by the crew for forcing her and because she was only paid for a vaginal sex scene? Holy crap. Regardless of what people think of the veracity of what's come out, it certainly doesn't sound like the porn industry is all that much better to women than it's ever been, despite the tales to the contrary and publicity about people like Dean who are passed off as feminists (what a laugh that's always been, at least to me, as if saying so makes it true?)
Why all the silence until Stoya makes one little tweet? Then the flood gates open. It is disheartening to think if only someone had said something before, some women might have been spared. That's the same old lament, but it's something that always strikes me. I don't ever blame a victim. But I don't excuse all those culpable who witnessed, profited from and perhaps (even inadvertently through their silence) encouraged this type of behavior.
And btw, if I hear one more Internet commenter say "but he's innocent until proven guilty! Where's the proof?!" I am going to scream. The rest of that is "innocent until proven guilty under a court of law" not the court of public opinion! I don't have to think he's innocent until some trial that may never arise. Just because there has been no investigation and prosecution doesn't mean none of this is true. Of course, people have to be smart enough to look at what facts they can and make their own decision. I don't think we need to hold off on having thoughts about it until (or if) there is a prosecution for cripes sake. Only the jurors are obligated not to pre-judge. You can't punish someone by violating their civil rights without due process, but you can sure base your other actions off what you think. If you find enough reason to find James Deen repulsive at this point, then don't feel like you can't offer your opinion, or not buy his stuff (has quite the little porn goods empire going).
Not that anyone here said a peep about any of that, but I read my fill the other day and guess I needed to vent, huh? Don't mind moi. I feel better already
I'm just trying to stir up a little trouble I guess...uh, I meant, help keep the forum going, yeah, that's it...