Quote:
Originally posted by
Ganconagh
Ahhh, interesting situation. Seems some people only support tolerance if your views agree with theirs, and demonize those who dare disagree with them. Not a very productive approach. Mr Cathy has every right to express his views. You dont have to
...
more
Ahhh, interesting situation. Seems some people only support tolerance if your views agree with theirs, and demonize those who dare disagree with them. Not a very productive approach. Mr Cathy has every right to express his views. You dont have to agree with him, but how is calling for his stores to be banned in some cities because you disagree with him tolerant? Tolerance works both ways. You cant bully people into changing their core beliefs.
I dont agree with his position, but neither do I agree with those of the KKK, Black Panthers, Aryan Nation or any other racist/hate group. BUT, I do recognize their right to express their views.
less
Tolerance does not mean tolerating hated, bigotry, prejudice or lies. I tolerate those I disagree and leave them in peace. I do not tolerate those that activly willfully, and deliberately, seek to do harm to others and strip them of their rights. This is not about Mr. Cathy's views it is about MR. Cathy actively
trying to force those views on others. I tolerate those that believe gay sex is wrong, I will not tolerate those that try to make it illegal. Tolerance does not mean I won't fight back when you throw a punch at me.
I do not care about Mr. Cathy core values nor do I want them to change them. I've said this before and I'll say this again people get this wrong the goal of things like boycotts is not changing beliefs it is changing behaviors. What I want to changed is chick a fil's willful, knowing, financial support of know hate groups. Mr. Cathy can continue believe gay sex is wrong all he likes if boycotts make him stop donating to hate groups I no longer care, because till then they are not just beliefs they are actions, deliberate attacks against the rights of others. Then it would be just his personal belief and not an active effort to strip people of their right, then it is tolerable. Till then boycotting those that would do you or your loved ones harm is not intolerant it is self-defense.
The discussion of rights is a red herring, no one is threatening Mr. Cathy rights. The right to express your views does not free you from consequence. The right to express your views does not mean you owed a profit. The right to speech does not come with the guarantee of an audience.