I've googled and googled and can't really find an answer to this question elsewhere. So where better to ask than Eden's renowned 'Social' forum?
For all the ladies that are a reader of any magazine, particularly ones with a fair amount of beauty Ads, I'm sure you've noticed the makeup in the Ads and how it's pitched to the public. What I don't understand is the extremely common advertising technique of crushing, destroying, or cutting the makeup advertised in the pictures.
Here are links to examples of this:
link
link
link
I can't find any pictures of the lipsticks and other products they basically ruin for the photos, though.
My question is what's the point of this? We don't gather up our new makeups and things we purchase and destroy them at home this way, so why pitch it to us in such a way? It doesn't help you see how it goes onto your skin or looks on your nails any better, as we know product photos are photo shopped just as much as those of people in magazines. My only guess is that it helps make the product look 'cooler,' but it's always bothered my OCD just a little bit to see things that cost money destroyed for a picture on a page. Maybe that's just me.
I'm not sure if it's just supposed to look 'pretty' for consumers, or if there's not a real reason at all. Just wondering if you guys had ever noticed it and wondered why as well?
For all the ladies that are a reader of any magazine, particularly ones with a fair amount of beauty Ads, I'm sure you've noticed the makeup in the Ads and how it's pitched to the public. What I don't understand is the extremely common advertising technique of crushing, destroying, or cutting the makeup advertised in the pictures.
Here are links to examples of this:
link
link
link
I can't find any pictures of the lipsticks and other products they basically ruin for the photos, though.
My question is what's the point of this? We don't gather up our new makeups and things we purchase and destroy them at home this way, so why pitch it to us in such a way? It doesn't help you see how it goes onto your skin or looks on your nails any better, as we know product photos are photo shopped just as much as those of people in magazines. My only guess is that it helps make the product look 'cooler,' but it's always bothered my OCD just a little bit to see things that cost money destroyed for a picture on a page. Maybe that's just me.
I'm not sure if it's just supposed to look 'pretty' for consumers, or if there's not a real reason at all. Just wondering if you guys had ever noticed it and wondered why as well?