The guy is being accused of lying to Oprah about saying he "didn't dope" for one certain race season. His titles are already gone. He has admitted doping, so why would he need to lie about that? What advantage would it give him on his evaporated credibility. I tend to think he was telling the truth. How about you?
After admitting to all the doping, do you think there would be any reason Lance Armstrong lied about not cheating in one race?
01/27/2013
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
I think he's just trying to salvage something out of nothing, and he might think it makes him sound less reprehensible than if he admitted cheating for every race he did.
01/27/2013
Total posts: 2
Unique posters: 2