The New Intimacy

Packer size help

Skip to last post
Set alerts
Updates
Forum search
Contributor: Niyari Niyari
I'm a super small guy (5'1 120lbs) but I really don't want the XS limpy because the balls seem absurd and overall very "boner" like. Does the Small bulge too? Just seems like with smaller balls it'll lay a bit flatter...
I usually wear boxer-briefs, but have multiple sorts of undies.
Thanks.
03/15/2012
  • Upgrade Your Hands-Free Play!
  • Long-distance pleasure set for couples
  • Save Extra 20% On Love Cushion And Toy Set!
  • Complete strap-on set for extra 15% off
  • Save 50% On Shower Nozzle With Enema Set
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
All promotions
Contributor: butts butts
The XS is the one I have, the balls ARE larger than the other models, as far as I know they use the same mold/packer as Mango, where I got mine from. From what I've heard the Small doesn't have as much of the "boner" problem, since the balls are smaller, it won't poke out as much. If you wear boxers, you'll DEFINITELY get the "boner" look since boxers don't hold down the packer like briefs will.
03/15/2012
Contributor: eroticmutt eroticmutt
The only packer I own that EdenFantasys sells is the 'Mr. Right', and I really like it but it IS a bit more prominent than my Peecock. Personally, I like the STP feature a lot more and yes it is a more costly toy but if you want something realistic, with a decent bulge and STP capabilities, I highly recommend them.

And hey, it's about tax time- the perfect time of year to try and get one if you are lucky on your return.
03/15/2012
Contributor: Niyari Niyari
Quote:
Originally posted by eroticmutt
The only packer I own that EdenFantasys sells is the 'Mr. Right', and I really like it but it IS a bit more prominent than my Peecock. Personally, I like the STP feature a lot more and yes it is a more costly toy but if you want something ... more
I definitely plan on getting a Peecock down the road, but the points system here is allowing me to test out how much I really need a packer.
03/31/2012
Contributor: kenny.the.dinosaur kenny.the.dinosaur
I would go with the Mr. Limpy small.
04/18/2012
Contributor: MasonM MasonM
Quote:
Originally posted by Niyari
I'm a super small guy (5'1 120lbs) but I really don't want the XS limpy because the balls seem absurd and overall very "boner" like. Does the Small bulge too? Just seems like with smaller balls it'll lay a bit ... more
Mr Limpy small has a bulge, but not a supremely large one. My partner kept complaining that it looked 'too big', but that's because I have a larger bulge than he does now.

It looks fine when wearing briefs and jeans.
04/18/2012
Contributor: Schattenstern Schattenstern
For as small as you are (I'm just a bit bigger than you) I would go with the extra small. If you get the "boner" issue due to the balls you can always unfold it I think.. I had to do it with my HUGE MEDIUM MR. LIMPY itssobig.
04/18/2012
Contributor: sneako sneako
Quote:
Originally posted by Niyari
I'm a super small guy (5'1 120lbs) but I really don't want the XS limpy because the balls seem absurd and overall very "boner" like. Does the Small bulge too? Just seems like with smaller balls it'll lay a bit ... more
I'm 5'6" and am planning on getting the S limpy if that helps.
04/18/2012
Contributor: Chirple Chirple
The XS testicles are a normal size, whereas the shaft on the Small is quite literally the size of an erection.

I'm 5'7" and 102lbs and it works fine for me.

I think the Small works if you want to be very obvious or only wear very baggy / heavy pants - and I think this might be the case for a lot of people. I do fairly often wear dress pants and it would be hard to make the Small not look like a hard-on.
04/19/2012
Contributor: Niyari Niyari
My pants are either really tight or super baggy D: Guess the XS it is hahaha
05/02/2012