Some thoughts: Even if, hypothetically, gender identity and sexuality were COMPLETELY optional, or "choices"... Would the cause of equal rights for all gender identities and sexualities be logically undermined in any significant way? If someone has chosen to act, dress, have sex, or generally just live their life peacefully in a non-normative way, does society have the right to condemn them if there are not any real negative societal effects stemming from the core of their choices? Why is the majority on the pro-LGBT side shouting "Born this way!" and the anti-LGBT side shouting "It's unnatural!"? How is the "natural/unnatural" argument at all relevant in the context of whether or not to treat all people equally?
It should be noted any chance of sexuality and/or gender identity being a choice have been rather thoroughly scientifically ruled out at this point. This is a hypothetical situation meant to stir up some thoughts and civil debate. What do you all think?
It should be noted any chance of sexuality and/or gender identity being a choice have been rather thoroughly scientifically ruled out at this point. This is a hypothetical situation meant to stir up some thoughts and civil debate. What do you all think?