Yeah, I'd like to know too. Like I have times where I cum and get a little more wet than usual, but I think that's just my bodily juices. All the squirting I've seen is like a freaking water hose lol.

so it feels the same as if you were peeing? but i imagine it would be an orgasmic pee lol

Not sure what it feels like, but the result is much wetter than an "ordinary" orgasm. I can feel the water running down my legs and there's a very wet spot under me (when she's on top anyway) - that's why I got a Liberator Throe.

This is a repeat of a posting I made on another thread - but seems applicable here;

Honestly I think the porn showing 'ejaculation' has exaggerated what is possible for most women. My wife calls her experience 'gushing' - because its more of a copious rush of lubrication than a male-esque ejaculation.

The mental picture she gets is that she's going to soak the bed. What actually happens depends on position.

If she's on her back or we're using the Liberator Wedge, he hips are tilted back and most of the gushing stays inside until we're done and she gets up - with the feeling of it running down her legs. Sounds a little gross - but remember she's just had a great series of orgasms and isn't about to little wetness ruin her glow.

If she's on top - cowgirl - the gushing will run down over me - eventually ending on our Liberator Throe - we never make love without it.

When I read these posts - I think many women are doing just fine - but they may be expecting too much. Just a thought!

Thanks! I'm pretty sure I have before, but the more I have been reading has made me doubt it. I know I did last night That was the first time I actually tried to do it.. but now I know that, yes, I have done it before because I remember some times where I felt the same way.

And that makes a lot more sense, gunsmoke. I seem to forget that the majority of porn is unrealistic.

Cherry, I think a lot of women have different experiences. I had my Bartholin Glands removed when I was 21, due to chronic infections, during an other gential-urinary surgery. I know I used to occasionally actually squirt (although not like in the pornos) before that. It's up for debate whether the Bartholin's Glands are involved or not, they are located at about 4:00 and 8:00 in your vagina, when you are lying on your back.

It seemed to make a difference with me, regarding ability to "squirt" when they were taken out. However, I didn't have any noticeable change in ability to lubricate, which is what is often feared, when this procedure is done. (We now know that the entire vagina "sweats" lubrication, it doesn't only come from 2 sets of glands, the Bartholin's Glands and the Skenes Glands. The Skenes glands are located close to the Bartholin's (if I remember my anatomy correctly) and seem to be more related to squirting. It appears, from both surgical procedures and dissections that not all women even have Skenes Glands, but this could be due to the fact that they are hard to find on cadavers, like many anatomical structures, when obviously not in use. I wonder now if, as they are so close, if my Skenes weren't removed as well.

I don't seem to actually squirt, but when I have a really really intense deep orgasm, with lots of G Spot stimulation (either a toy or My Man's hand in just the right spot) there is often a very concentrated, heavy wet spot on the bed. It seems to darken the sheets more than just plain lubrication, and if it doesn't land on a towel, it takes a while to dry. It has virtually no smell at all, but seems a little thicker than lubrication and definitely thicker than pee would be. One of us will see it (if it's morning and we're making love or the light is on) and comment that he must have hit my G Spot.

If it's at night, even if we don't see it, I have to sleep on a towel, because it's just TOO wet to sleep on. And, it is really different than a regular "Wet Spot."

Here's an interesting, not too clinical article with pictures about the glands.

Skene's Gland and "squiriting" stuff