Hi Cynthia,

Thanks for the answer; however, I'm either confused or there's a glitch in the program. My current rank is above 5.5 and I've got two reviews that I submitted a couple of days ago that have not been published. Also, I cannot edit them as I used to be able to in the past (I can still edit some of the other reviews).

As I mentioned before, I also submitted several follow-up reviews and only one of those posted instantly. The others still are not there. Any ideas? Thanks! less

I just don't understand the point of rating anyway? I mean, what I think would be better. Be picky, let those who want to be part of the program submit a request, give them a fake review, or a real review (or any document) to for them to edit, one that will test them. If they pass, let them be an editor. I just do not see the point of the editor ranking, we have enough ratings with the review program, do we really need more? I just think that someone coming to Eden that has not familiarized themselves with the site goes and reads a bad review, and rates the the editor as poor even though the grammar was perfect. With the review rating system it is pretty obvious, not so much with the editor rating system. I don't know if this has happened yet, but it is a concern.

I think expanding on editors is a fine idea, I am all for the idea. Heck, you can even put their names underneath the reviews "This review was edited by:", but I just don't know about the need for a vote. less

I just don't understand the point of rating anyway? I mean, what I think would be better. Be picky, let those who want to be part of the program submit a request, give them a fake review, or a real review (or any document) to for them to edit, one that will test them. If they pass, let them be an editor. I just do not see the point of the editor ranking, we have enough ratings with the review program, do we really need more? I just think that someone coming to Eden that has not familiarized themselves with the site goes and reads a bad review, and rates the the editor as poor even though the grammar was perfect. With the review rating system it is pretty obvious, not so much with the editor rating system. I don't know if this has happened yet, but it is a concern.

I think expanding on editors is a fine idea, I am all for the idea. Heck, you can even put their names underneath the reviews "This review was edited by:", but I just don't know about the need for a vote. less

I just don't understand the point of rating anyway? I mean, what I think would be better. Be picky, let those who want to be part of the program submit a request, give them a fake review, or a real review (or any document) to for them to edit, one that will test them. If they pass, let them be an editor. I just do not see the point of the editor ranking, we have enough ratings with the review program, do we really need more? I just think that someone coming to Eden that has not familiarized themselves with the site goes and reads a bad review, and rates the the editor as poor even though the grammar was perfect. With the review rating system it is pretty obvious, not so much with the editor rating system. I don't know if this has happened yet, but it is a concern.

I think expanding on editors is a fine idea, I am all for the idea. Heck, you can even put their names underneath the reviews "This review was edited by:", but I just don't know about the need for a vote. less

Hey everyone! I am happy to see everyone is so excited. This feature has been in the works for a while, (one of the two big ones I have hinted about). Well, it was actually released a few days ahead of schedule. We had planned on the announcing and releasing on Monday. So, for whatever the reason it is live now. Please check it out, and I will post the official announcement and answer questions in a few minutes. less

I just don't understand the point of rating anyway? I mean, what I think would be better. Be picky, let those who want to be part of the program submit a request, give them a fake review, or a real review (or any document) to for them to edit, one that will test them. If they pass, let them be an editor. I just do not see the point of the editor ranking, we have enough ratings with the review program, do we really need more? I just think that someone coming to Eden that has not familiarized themselves with the site goes and reads a bad review, and rates the the editor as poor even though the grammar was perfect. With the review rating system it is pretty obvious, not so much with the editor rating system. I don't know if this has happened yet, but it is a concern.

I think expanding on editors is a fine idea, I am all for the idea. Heck, you can even put their names underneath the reviews "This review was edited by:", but I just don't know about the need for a vote. less

Exactly what I've been thinking. There's no way to tell how much of the review is the editor's doing and how much was in the original.

I like the idea of this editor program, though. Grammatical mistakes and misspellings annoy the shit out of me. less

I agree. Every time, eye sea miss spelings and gramaticle miss takes, it drives me nuts to. It relee drives mi crazy when their our alot of problems and it wood bee alot easier if they could insure that everyones problems werent their and the everyoneelses mistakes werent their two. The wons that make mi the crazyest our mi own. less

I agree. Every time, eye sea miss spelings and gramaticle miss takes, it drives me nuts to. It relee drives mi crazy when their our alot of problems and it wood bee alot easier if they could insure that everyones problems werent their and the everyoneelses mistakes werent their two. The wons that make mi the crazyest our mi own. less

I agree. Every time, eye sea miss spelings and gramaticle miss takes, it drives me nuts to. It relee drives mi crazy when their our alot of problems and it wood bee alot easier if they could insure that everyones problems werent their and the everyoneelses mistakes werent their two. The wons that make mi the crazyest our mi own. less