I say Adam first. The product page has the Adam at 5 1/4" around, which is slightly smaller than the Cush's 5 1/2".
Speaking from personal experience, I own the Cush and my eyes were waay bigger than my vagina. It's head is quite cushy (), but its shaft is so thick that the outer layer seems miniscule given the girth of the firmer core that supports it. I assume the Adam is similar to my Mark, which has a thicker squishy layer. That being said, if you're just going for that deliciously full feeling with a side of dual-density silicone, I bet the Cush delivers!
I say Adam first. The product page has the Adam at 5 1/4" around, which is slightly smaller than the Cush's 5 1/2". Speaking from personal experience, I own the Cush and my eyes were waay bigger than my vagina. It's head is
...
more
I say Adam first. The product page has the Adam at 5 1/4" around, which is slightly smaller than the Cush's 5 1/2". Speaking from personal experience, I own the Cush and my eyes were waay bigger than my vagina. It's head is quite cushy (), but its shaft is so thick that the outer layer seems miniscule given the girth of the firmer core that supports it. I assume the Adam is similar to my Mark, which has a thicker squishy layer. That being said, if you're just going for that deliciously full feeling with a side of dual-density silicone, I bet the Cush delivers!
less
I own Adam but have been very interested in Crush...Adam seemed a bit too soft around the outside. Are you saying that the Crush might be more firm? If it is I'm def going to look into it!